On the interaction between energy price and firm size in Indian economy

AuthorAnver C Sadath,Rajesh H Acharya
Date01 September 2016
Published date01 September 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/opec.12080
On the interaction between energy price and
firm size in Indian economy
Rajesh H Acharya* and Anver C Sadath**
*Assistant Professor, School of Management, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal
Srinivasanagar Post, Surathkal, Managluru 575025, India. Email: rajeshacharyah@gmail.com
**Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Central University of Kerala, Tejaswini Hills, Periye Post,
Kasaragod District, Kerala, India. Email: anver.omanoor@gmail.com
Abstract
This paper examines the connection between oil price changes and size of rms listed in Indian
stock market. A three-factor FamaFrench model along with oil price variables is estimated using
data from a panel of 1535 rms. Results show that there is a positive relationship between growth
in oil price and stock return. Similarly, the size of the rm is also positively related to stock return.
However, oil price uncertainty shows a negative relationship with stock return. Overall, these
results imply that targeted measures should be put in place by the policy makers to safeguard the
interests of the small and medium size rms in India.
1. Introduction and background
The dynamics of the response of business rms to the changes in the price of energy
resources such as oil is an extensively documented issue in the literature. For instance,
while a strand of research examined the implications of the oil price uncertainty or
changes on the investment of the rms (see for example, Davis and Haltiwanger, 2001;
Edelstein and Kilian, 2007; Lee et al., 2011; Yoon and Ratti, 2011 and Sadath and
Acharya, 2015), another strand of literature has focused on the impact of oil price
changes on the stock markets (see for example, Huang et al.,1996; Jones and Kaul,
1996; Cong et al., 2008; Aloui and Jammazi, 2009; Arouri and Nguyen, 2010) or on the
overall macroeconomic performance of the economy (see for example, Hamilton, 1983,
1996, 2003; Hooker, 1996; Barsky and Kilian, 2004 and Klian and Vigfusson, 2011).
However, scant attention was paid to analyse whether size of the rm has any role in
determining its response to changes in the energy prices such as oil price. In this paper,
therefore, we examine whether size of the rm matters in the formulation of response to
the oil price changes by Indian manufacturing rms.
JEL classication: Q41, L25, G12, C23.
©2016 Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 9600 Garsington
Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.
300
It appears that the size of the rm ought to be regarded as a crucial factor, inter alia,
in determining the response of a rm to changes in the prices of energy resources. As
Sadorsky (2008) observed based on the review of extant literature that impact of energy
price changes is felt more on middle-sized rms compared to small and large rms. This
is due to the fact that larger rms are believed to be equipped to deal with such business
challenges and thereby mitigate negative impacts, whereas, small rms will be exible
enough to adapt themselves according to the warranty of the situation. Bardazzi et al.
(2015), for instance, in their study about the response of the Italian manufacturing rms
to energy price changes taking into consideration the heterogeneity of rm size argued
that energy resources are substitutes in the low-technology sector and weak comple-
ments in all other sectors. Sahu and Narayana (2011) in their research to understand the
determinants of protability and energy intensity of Indian manufacturing industries
found a non-linear relationship between protability and size of the rm indicating an
inverted U-shaped relationship. This indicates that bigger rms and smaller size rms are
less protable as compared to the medium-sized rms.
Moreover, large rms with greater market power and economies of scale will be more
efcient (Oczkowski and Sharma, 2007; Sadath and Acharya, 2015). This implies that such
rms will be in a position to absorb changes in the prices of intermediary energy inputs and
therefore ensure that increase in the cost of production as a result of short-term aberrations
of energy prices did not affect prices of their output and thereby decrease in the demand. In
other words, large rms will have more exibility in the use of energy resources compared
to other rms. This kind of reasoning implies that small or medium-sized rms will be hit by
the changes in the price of energy products as they will be unable to absorb prices of their
inputs. Kleijweg et al. (1990) in their analysis of whether large rms have more exibility
in energy use and thereby reduce the energy cost than small rms in the Dutch
manufacturing sector found that large rms have a relative advantage compared to small
rms in terms of the reduction of the energy cost in the total cost of production.
Likewise, the size of the rm has to be gured in while analysing the efforts of rms to
achieve energy efciency and thereby tackle the problems of global warming and climate
change caused by the greenhouse gas emission. This aspect is demonstrated by Cost-Cambi
et al. (2015) who found that size is an important varia ble in explaining the energy
efciency innovations of the rms. Similar results are reported by DeCanio and Watkins
(1998), DeMarchi (2012) and Veugelers (2012). Therefore, there exists a case for an
empirical examination to determine whether the response of rms to changes in energy
prices varies according to their size? Towards this, this study has analysed a panel of Indian
rms by using a dynamic panel data model based on Generalized Method of Moments
(GMM) developed by Arellano and Bond (1991). Results show that there is a positive
relationship between growth in oil prices and stock return. Similarly, size is also positively
related to stock return. However, oil price uncertainly shows a negative relationship with
©2016 Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries OPEC Energy Review September 2016
Interaction between energy price and firm size 301

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT