Oil prices and European household consumption expenditures

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/opec.12170
Date01 March 2020
AuthorMaruška Vizek,James E. Payne,Junsoo Lee
Published date01 March 2020
Oil prices and European household
consumption expenditures
Maru
ska Vizek*, Junsoo Lee** and James E. Payne***
*Director, Institute of Economics Zagreb, Trg J. F. Kennedya 7, Zagreb, Croatia . Email: mvizek@eizg.hr
**Professor, Department of Economics, Finance and Legal Studies, The University of Alabama,
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA . Email: jlee@cba.ua.edu
***Dean, College of Business Administration, Paul L. Foster and Alejandra de la Foster, Distinguished Chair
in International Business, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA . Email: jpayne2@utep.edu
Abstract
This study examines the inuence of changes in oil prices on total household consumption along
with its sub-components from 1996 to 2018, a period characterised in the literature by the
declining impact of oil price shocks on macroeconomic activity. Using several dynamic panel
VAR econometric approaches, we examine the role of oil prices alongside income, wealth and debt
on household consumption expenditures of 30 European countries. Results from the Granger
causality tests and impulse response analysis suggest an unanticipated increase in oil prices lowers
household consumption. These results are robust to changes in proxies for income, wealth and oil
prices, variable ordering, estimation method and the addition of household debt service. Moreover,
the inclusion of a Fourier function to the baseline panel specications to control for unobserved
non-linear structural breaks does not change our main ndings. A threshold panel VAR model with
median oil price changes used as a threshold indicator suggests the reaction of household
consumption to oil price shocks is regime-dependent; i.e., consumption only reacts to oil price
shocks during periods when oil prices grow faster than the median rate of change. All consumption
sub-components decrease in response to increasing oil prices, but as expected, the consumption of
durable goods exhibits the largest decline after an oil price shock.
1. Introduction
The relationship between oil prices and the macroeconomy has been intensively debated
in the literature over the last four decades. Studies by Rasche and Tatom (1977, 1981),
Hamilton (1983), Burbidge and Harrison (1984), Santini (1985a,b), Mork (1989, 1994)
and Hooker (1996) and more recent research from Hamilton (2005), Cunado and Perez
de Gracia (2005), Kilian (2006; 2008a,b; 2010), Lescaroux and Mignon (2008), Lippi
and Nobili (2012) and Baumeister and Kilian (2016) conclude oil prices have a
signicant effect on economic output.
1
Studies also tend to agree that the economic
effects of oil price shocks have decreased over time (Edelstein and Kilian, 2007;
©2020 Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 9600 Garsington
Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.
59
Blanchard and Gali, 2007; Lescaroux and Mignon, 2008; Herrera and Pesavento, 2009;
Blanchard and Riggi, 2013; Ramey, 2016). This has been attributed to several factors: (i)
improvements in energy efciency and alternative energy sources, (ii) the reduction in
wage indexation, (iii) shift in industrial structure towards less-energy-intensive industries
and (iv) enhanced credibility of monetary policy to combat ination as more central
banks have moved towards ination targets (Lescaroux and Mignon, 2008; Kilian,
2008a; Blanchard and Riggi, 2013).
2
Although there is a great deal of empirical evidence suggesting oil prices inuence
overall economic activity, the research on the impact of oil prices on household
consumption behaviour has been rather limited. This study extends the literature on the
impact of oil prices on the macroeconomy by focusing our attention on household
consumption, the largest component of GDP. In our study, we examine the impact of oil
prices on household consumption for countries within the European Union (EU) along
with Iceland and Norway. Since the global nancial crisis in 2008, there has been an
overall slowdown in household consumption spending in Europe in part due to the
deleveraging associated with the build-up of household debt leading up to the crisis. The
recent slowdown in European overall consumption spending can also be attributed to
demographic changes and disparities in income trends across countries, especially for
those transition countries within the EU (Bouyon, 2015; Coletta et al., 2019). As for the
inuence of energy consumption in the EU, according to the World Bank Development
Indicators in the 28 EU member countries, fossil fuels continue to dominate primary
energy consumption, although their share declined from 85.2 per cent in 1960 to 71.1 per
cent in 2015. Even though the share of primary energy consumption of oil has declined
from 35 per cent in 1990 to 31 per cent in 2016, due in large measure to the proliferation
of renewable energy sources, oil still remains the most important source of primary
energy consumption in the EU.
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the rst to explore in a systematic fashion
the oil pricehousehold consumption relationship for European countries. Specically,
we rst explore the effects of oil price shocks on household consumption expenditures
by drawing upon two well-cited consumption theories: the permanent income of
Friedman (1957) and the life-cycle hypotheses of Ando and Modigliani (1963). We
incorporate proxies of income and wealth alongside oil prices in explaining household
consumption in the aggregate and by consumption sub-components (durable, semi-
durable, non-durables and services). Secondly, given the literature on the economic
effects of oil prices has yielded divergent results regarding the potential non-linear
effects of oil price changes on economic activity, we also test for the possibility of non-
linearity. Thirdly, we use both the national and market prices of oil in assessing the effect
of oil price changes on household consumption expenditures. Fourthly, we conduct
several robustness checks with the inclusion of aggregate household debt service in order
OPEC Energy Review March 2020 ©2020 Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
60 Maru
ska Vizek et al.
to account for possible balance sheet effects that oil price increases may exert on private
consumption. Fifthly, our analysis employs a battery of dynamic panel econometric
approaches in the use of GMM estimators in the context of panel vector autoregressive
(P-VAR), panel error correction (P-EC) and threshold panel VAR to understand the oil
pricehousehold consumption relationship.
Section 2 reviews both the direct and indirect channels by which changes in oil
prices impact household consumption expenditures and the studies specic to the oil
pricehousehold consumption relationship. Section 3 presents the methodology and
data, while Section 4 discusses the results. Section 5 provides concluding remarks.
2. Literature review
According to Mork (1994), Brown and Yucel (2002) and Kilian (2008a,b), there are four
direct channels by which consumption spending is affected by energy price shocks.
Firstly, the discretionary income channel assumes that higher energy prices lead to
higher energy expenditures by households, which, in turn, decreases the discretionary
income of households. As noted by Hamilton (2011), the elasticity of any macroeco-
nomic aggregate, with respect to the relative price of energy, is the energy expenditure
share times the price elasticity of energy demand. As the share of energy consumption of
total consumption is relatively small, even with the perfectly inelastic demand for
energy, the discretionary income effect has an upper bound. Secondly, changing energy
prices may create uncertainty about the future path of energy prices, causing consumers
to postpone irreversible purchases of consumer durables (Bernanke, 1983 and Pindyck,
1991). Thirdly, even when purchase decisions are reversible, household consumption
may decrease in response to energy price shocks as consumers increase their
precautionary savings. This precautionary savings effect may arise if consumers smooth
their consumption spending because they perceive a greater likelihood of future
unemployment and income losses. Fourthly, higher energy prices affect the consump-
tion of durables (such as cars and other machinery requiring fossile fuels) throught
operating cost effect, i.e. as the operating cost of such goods increase due to higher
energy prices, the consumption of such goods is postponed.
In addition to the four direct channels outlined, Mehra and Petersen (2005) also
dene a fth direct channel called the real balance effect. The real balance effect
suggests that oil price increases spawn ination, thereby lowering real money balances
held by households and rms, thus decreasing aggregate demand and real output. In
response to the inationary effects of an oil price increase, the indirect effect of the
monetary authoritiesresponse to inationary pressures through a restrictive monetary
stance may further reduce real output. Another indirect effect is the income transfer
effect, which depends on the extent to which oil price increases create income transfers
©2020 Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries OPEC Energy Review March 2020
How do oil prices affect household consumption? 61

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT