Ohio National Life Insurance Company's Termination or Trail Commissions.

AuthorGabay, Sari
Position[LEGAL UPDATE]

The issue of termination of trail commissions has been a popular topic in insurance industry news since Ohio National Life Insurance Company terminated trail commissions. More specifically, by letter dated September 21, 2018, Ohio National wrote to various agents and broker-dealers "to provide notice of termination of any and all selling agreements" [effective December 12, 2018]. Further, according to the termination notice letter, "all individual annuity trail compensation will cease at that time. All group variable annuity trail compensation and life insurance renewal commissions will continue to be paid per the terms of the selling agreement."

In the life insurance and annuity contracts arena, there is typically a larger commission in the first year, followed by trail commissions for the life of the policy or contract. Given that many life insurance agents rely on these trail commissions, Ohio National's decision to terminate certain broker-dealer agreements has led to a flurry of class action and individual lawsuits, with at least 10 currently pending in courts across the country, including federal district court actions filed in Ohio, Texas, New Jersey, and California, among other states. There are also several arbitrations pending, and the forum of private arbitration versus court may have been governed by consent to arbitration language in a particular selling agreement.

In the publicly filed complaint from UBS Financial Services Inc. ("UBS"), UBS alleges that Ohio National determined that the annuity contracts with guaranteed minimum income benefit (GMIB) riders were uneconomical in an environment of high regulation and low interest rates. According to the lawsuits, Ohio National breached its selling agreements which guaranteed the payment of trail commissions until the annuities were surrendered or annuitized. UBS claims that when Ohio National determined that its GMIB rider contracts were not economical, they tried to initiate an exchange offer to persuade holders of variable annuities with GMIB riders to exchange those products for other investments, which did not necessarily go according to plan as several UBS customers decided not to accept the exchange offer and, instead, chose to remain with their current variable annuity contracts.

In its defense, Ohio National claims that payments were only due while the contracts were in force, and cites to language in the selling agreements, providing that it "remains in force and will be...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT