Officer Resignation and the Space Between Theory and Practice
Date | 01 July 2019 |
Published date | 01 July 2019 |
DOI | 10.1177/0095327X18806504 |
Subject Matter | Commentaries |
Commentary
Officer Resignation
and the Space Between
Theory and Practice
Ashleen Menchaca-Bagnulo
1
Abstract
Having read the erudite contributions of Dubik, Feaver, Kohn, Mueller, and Snider,
I can only supplement our mutual inquiry through the contribution of an analysis of
officer resignation from the perspective of Western political thought, particularly as
embodied by strands of the civic republic tradition. I believe this tradition can give us
a foundation for talking about officer resignation and a means for drawing strict
boundaries around when such dissent is appropriate.
Keywords
officer resignation, civic republicanism, realism, civil–military relations
The civic republican tradition is especially suited as a framework for considering the
interactions between armed forces and societies because it unites an understanding
of autonomy and individual judgment in a context that also acknowledges the
obligations of public duty and social roles, and the necessity of a mutual search for
a common good in an institutional framework that promotes political stability. In
bringing this tradition and its insights into our conversation, I believe a case can be
made for conscientious officer resignation in times of extreme duress as an aspect of
fulfilling one’s duties to both one’s conscience and one’s country. Those opposed to
1
Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA
Corresponding Author:
Ashleen Menchaca-Bagnulo, Texas State University, UAC 355, 601 University Drive, San Marcos,
TX 78666, USA.
Email: a_k230@txstate.edu
Armed Forces & Society
2019, Vol. 45(3) 532-545
ªThe Author(s) 2018
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0095327X18806504
journals.sagepub.com/home/afs
To continue reading
Request your trial