Occupational Licensing and Minority Participation in Professional Labor Markets

Published date01 May 2024
AuthorANDREW G. SUTHERLAND,MATTHIAS UCKERT,FELIX W. VETTER
Date01 May 2024
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12518
DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12518
Journal of Accounting Research
Vol. 62 No. 2 May 2024
Printed in U.S.A.
Occupational Licensing and
Minority Participation in
Professional Labor Markets
ANDREW G. SUTHERLAND ,MATTHIAS UCKERT,
AND FELIX W. VETTER
Received 3 December 2021; accepted 9 November 2023
ABSTRACT
We examine the staggered adoption of additional educational requirements
(“150-hour rule”) for Certif‌ied Public Accountants (“CPAs”) to understand
the effects of occupational licensing on minority participation in professional
labor markets. The 150-hour rule increased the educational requirement for
CPAs from 120 to 150 credit hours, effectively adding a f‌ifth year of study.
We f‌ind a 13% greater entry decline following the requirement’s enactment
for minority than nonminority CPA candidates. Our analyses of parental in-
come and f‌inancial aid availability point to a socioeconomic status channel
MIT Sloan School of Management; University of Amsterdam; University of Mannheim
Accepted by Regina Wittenberg Moerman. For helpful comments and discussions, we
thank two anonymous reviewers and an associate editor,Ray Ball, John Barrios, Jannis Bischof,
Peter Blair, Hans Christensen, John Core, Maria Correia (discussant), Holger Daske, Philipp
Dörrenberg, Jewel Evans, Michelle Hanlon, Lawrence Katz, S.P. Kothari, Brad Larsen, Chris-
tian Leuz, Glenn Loury, Maureen McNichols, Rodrigo Verdi, Joe Weber, and seminar par-
ticipants at Chicago, the Columbia Diversity Equity and Inclusion Workshop, MIT, Oxford
FAME, Stanford, the 2023 Swiss Winter Accounting Conference, the University of Mannheim,
the University of Münster, and UT-Dallas. Sutherland acknowledges support from MIT Sloan.
Uckert and Vetter acknowledge support from the University of Mannheim and from the Ger-
man Research Foundation Project-ID 403041268 – TRR 266 Accounting for Transparency.
An online appendix to this paper can be downloaded at https://www.chicagobooth.edu/jar-
online-supplements
[Correction added on 13 March 2024, after online publication: A few sentences have been
modif‌ied on pages 4 and 25 in the article.]
453
© 2023 The Chookaszian Accounting Research Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of
Business.
454 a. g. sutherland, m. uckert, and f. w. vetter
explaining the differential entry declines. Studying exam passing patterns,
professional misconduct, and job postings we f‌ind a deterioration, or at best,
no change in CPA quality following enactment.
JEL codes: J24, J44, K2, L51, M40, M41, M42
Keywords: occupational licensing; labor markets; CPAs; diversity and
inclusion; regulatory capture; accounting quality
1. Introduction
Professional employers are increasingly mentioning diversity, equity, and in-
clusion objectives in their hiring practices and overall strategies (McKinsey
[2020], WorldAtWork[2021], Choi et al. [2023]). However, minorities con-
tinue to be underrepresented in many high-paying occupations (Bureau of
Labor Statistics [2021]). Such disparities attract signif‌icant public attention
and call for research to understand their sources. In this paper, we inves-
tigate one commonly mentioned source: entry barriers associated with oc-
cupational licensing (House Committee on Education and the Workforce
[2016], Nunn [2016]).
Licensing in many professions involves costly general education require-
ments. For example, those seeking to enter accounting, law, or medicine
in the United States must f‌irst obtain a four-year undergraduate degree,
with only limited conditions around specif‌ic courses taken.1Even if such
education requirements are developed and enforced in a race-neutral way,
they can have disparate effects depending on individuals’ ability to afford
college and forego income.
Although the United States provides educational aid in several forms,
various caps and restrictions can still affect higher education enrollment at
the margin (Dynarski [2003], Avery and Turner [2012]). Private borrowing
and personal wealth then come into play. Borrowing against human capi-
tal is notoriously diff‌icult (Becker [1962]), and many parents access private
loans or take out second mortgages on behalf of their f‌inancially dependent
children (Sun and Yannelis [2016]). Thus, given the nature of income and
wealth inequality in the United States (Loury [2009], Bayer and Charles
[2018], Chetty et al. [2020]), general education requirements can dispro-
portionately reduce minority participation in licensed occupations.
An alternative view is that licensing can increase minority participation if
it helps mitigate information asymmetries in credence good markets (Blair
and Chung [2021]), for example, by providing a signaling device (Spence
[1973]). As Law and Marks [2009] explain: “If uncertainty about worker
quality gives rise to statistical discrimination over observable characteristics
1Accountants generally obtain a business degree and complete just 30 credit hours of spe-
cif‌ic accounting coursework. Matriculating law school students are equally likely to have a de-
gree in psychology,economics, or history (LSAC [2018]); English m ajorscan enroll in medical
school as long as they have passed a few science classes.
occupational licensing and minority participation 455
like sex or race, then licensing regulation that serves as an imprimatur of
quality can increase the presence of minority workers in regulated occu-
pations.” Law and Marks [2009] study U.S. Census data from 1870 to 1960
and f‌ind support for this view, though their f‌indings have spurred contro-
versy (Klein, Powell, and Vorotnikov [2012], Law and Marks [2012]). The
Alliance for Responsible Professional Licensing, sponsored by professional
associations of accountants, architects, and engineers, argues that “licen-
sure creates a set of institutional mechanisms that enhance entry into a
profession, particularly for historically disadvantaged groups” (p. 15, ARPL
[2021]).
A key empirical diff‌iculty surrounding this debate is that licensing re-
quirements tend to be sticky, and few settings allow researchers to observe
licensed individuals. To address this, we investigate the Certif‌ied Public
Accountant (“CPA”) setting. State Boards of Accountancy maintain pub-
lic databases of all CPAs and their license status. And every U.S. state has
adopted, in a staggered pattern over the past 35 years, the “150-hour rule,”
which requires the equivalent of a f‌ifth year of general education (i.e., ac-
counting courses are typically not required) at an accredited college or uni-
versity. Obtaining funding for a f‌ifth year can be diff‌icult, and this burden
as well as and the foregone income may disproportionally dissuade lower
income students.2
We begin by identifying the race and gender of each CPA using that
person’s name and Bayesian prediction algorithms trained on U.S. Census
and Social Security Administration data.3These techniques assign a prob-
ability that each f‌irst name–last name pairing is associated with each race
and gender, allowing us to classify CPAs as minority (Black and Hispanic)
or nonminority (Asian and White) and male or female. Our classif‌ication
scheme follows the standard in the inequality literature (Card and Krueger
[2005], Campbell and Kaufman [2006], Fischer [2007]) and is based on
historical wealth and income differences across groups (Social Security Ad-
ministration [2023]). Although there is noise in these techniques, we take
comfort in the signif‌icant distribution overlap between our sample and the
American Institute of Certif‌ied Public Accountants’ (AICPA) member sur-
vey (ARPL [2021]).
Our primary objective is to evaluate the effect of the 150-hour rule
on minority CPA entry. Our main tests model the number of individuals
obtaining their CPA license each state-year in a generalized difference-
in-differences design that controls for state and year f‌ixed effects and
2In their theoretical analysis of the 150-hour rule, Lee, Liu, and Wang [1999] state: “The
prediction (5) that some less wealthy post-rule CPA candidates who would otherwise enter
the market will not do so under the Rule is consistent with the ALEC [American Legislative
Exchange Council]’s claim that the number of minorities and lower income students entering
the profession would decrease with the additional requirement” (p. 205).
3For other examples, see Ambekar et al. [2009], Imai and Khanna [2016], Karimi et al.
[2016], Ellahie, Tahoun,and Tuna [2017], Dimmock, Gerken, and Graham [2018], Sood and
Laohaprapanon [2018], Idan and Feigenbaum [2019], Card et al. [2020], Chernenko and
Scharfstein [2022], Howell et al. [2021], and Egan, Matvos, and Seru [2022].

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex