Occupation pension for public employees in the People's Republic of China: A new approach with defined benefit underpin pension plan

Date01 August 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12404
AuthorKai Chen
Published date01 August 2018
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
Occupation pension for public employees in the
Peoples Republic of China: A new approach with
defined benefit underpin pension plan
Kai Chen
Peking University, Beijing, Peoples
Republic of China
Correspondence
Kai Chen, Department of Risk
Management and Insurance, School of
Economics, Peking University, No. 5
Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing,
P. R. China 100871.
Email: chen.kai@pku.edu.cn
Funding Information
National Natural Science Foundation of
China (NSFC) Young Scholar Grant No.
71503016 and Ministry of Education Key
Projects of Philosophy and Social
Sciences Research Grant No. 14JZD027.
Abstract
The State Council of the Peoples Republic of China
announced a reformed pension plan for public employees
with the occupation pension plan in January 2015, offi-
cially disclosing that the social pension systems for pri-
vate and public employees will be unified. Our proposed
occupation pension plan for public employees is one of
the important components in transiting from a dual-track
pension system to a sustainable and unified system. We
aim at providing a pension design, that is, the defined
benefit (DB) underpin pension with estimates of the costs
and benefits. We have used a financial engineering
approach to calculate the hedge contribution for a DB
underpin hybrid pension plan benefit. We also treat pen-
sion benefit and salaries in aggregate. Therefore, we pro-
pose a stochastic and exogenous salary model.
Employeestotal benefits can be determined by multiple
factors, such as inflation, economic environment, and
employers preference. However, the expectation of
employeestotal benefits should not be affected by the
change of salary and pension benefits. Our results could
facilitate the ongoing pension reform in the Peoples
Republic of China, providing a rigorous benchmark with
public policy implications as to plan design, cost estima-
tion, as well as risk management approach.
DOI: 10.1111/rode.12404
990
|
©2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/rode Rev Dev Econ. 2018;22:9901004.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT