Objectivity and Truth: The Role of the Essay in Management Scholarship

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12340
AuthorRoy Suddaby
Date01 March 2019
Published date01 March 2019
Objectivity and Truth: The Role of the Essay in
Management Scholarship
Roy Suddaby
University of Victoria and Newcastle University
JMS Says was introduced at a symposium of the 2015 Academy of Management.
During that session an audience member asked how business-school deans might evalu-
ate the publication of an essay. The implication of the question was clear. Business
scholarship is based on science and the essay is anything but scientific. So how could it
‘count’ as knowledge?
The question betrayed the assumptive status order of how different knowledge forms
are valued in business schools. Journal articles are legitimate. Books and book chapters
are not. Introducing the essay into this gnostic hierarchy was unsettling, like inviting a
philosopher to an accounting convention. As a form of knowledge, the essay was so for-
eign to the questioner’s ‘order of things’ that it simply did not make sense.
The cultural status order of legitimate management knowledge has co-evolved over
many years with the growing popularity of business education. It has several curious
characteristics that distinguish business schools from other academic disciplines. It is
odd, for example, that books count for so little in business, when they are highly valued
in the humanities. By citation count, books seem to have been quite influential in the
history of management theory. Though we bemoan our inability to interest practitioners
in the content of our journal articles, textbooks, which are the primary point of contact
with practitioners, count for very little, if at all. Like unfamiliar cultural standards of
beauty such as foot binding in China and or ear stretching of the Maasai, the fundamen-
tal codes of a community often generates its own peculiar logics of worth.
I was reminded of the questioner’s challenge to the legitimacy of the essay recently
when reading a series of papers that describe a growing legitimacy crisis in management
scholarship. The first was a paper that tried and failed to reproduce the findings of a
number of studies in a prominent strategic management journal (Bergh et al., 2017).
The second was a paper, currently working its way through the review process, that
Address for reprints: Roy Suddaby, Peter B. Gustavson School of Business, Business and Economics Build-
ing, Room 254, 3800 Finnerty Road, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8P
5C2 (rsuddaby@uvic.ca).
V
C2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for the Advancement of Management Studies
Journal of Management Studies
doi: 10.1111/joms.12340
56:2 March 2019
For your comments about this discussion, please visit http://www.socadms.org.uk/
objectivity-and-truth-the-role-of-the-essay-in-management-scholarship/

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT