Nudging Public Employees Through Descriptive Social Norms in Healthcare Organizations
Published date | 01 July 2021 |
Author | Nicola Belle,Paola Cantarelli |
Date | 01 July 2021 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13353 |
Research Article
Nudging Public Employees Through Descriptive Social Norms in Healthcare Organizations 589
Abstract: We draw on the focus theory of normative conduct and nudge theory to experimentally test the effect of
descriptive social norms on desired behaviors that public employees may engage in at suboptimal levels, namely,
vaccination and help-seeking. Through a series of framed randomized controlled trials with 19,984 public healthcare
professionals, we demonstrate that descriptive norms—doing what the majority of others do—trigger conformity.
Specifically, employees are more likely to get a flu shot and advocate vaccination when knowing that the majority of
their colleagues get vaccinated against the seasonal influenza compared to when most colleagues do not. Similarly, the
probability of making help requests on the job is noticeably higher when asking colleagues for advice is the norm rather
than not. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these experiments for scholars and policy makers
interested in predictably altering high-stakes behaviors among public employees through low-powered incentives.
Evidence for Practice
• Public organizations and their managers can leverage social norms to fuel desired behaviors that employees
may otherwise engage in at suboptimal levels.
• Public organizations with high vaccination coverage rates can promote vaccination by informing their
employees that the majority of their colleagues get the flu shot.
• Public organizations with low vaccination coverage rates must implement interventions to increase
vaccination coverage before they can take advantage of the effect of descriptive social norms.
• Explicitly communicating that asking colleagues for help is a desirable social norm can foster widespread
adoption of this behavior, which in turn can trigger helping at work.
If choice architects want to shift behavior and to do so
with a nudge, they might simply inform people about
what other people are doing.
Thaler and Sunstein(2008)
Vaccination has proven to be a highly cost-
effective means of improving world health,
yet “every year throughout the world… two
to three million people die from diseases that can
be prevented with vaccines” (Banerjee et al.,2010,
1). Seasonal influenza alone, for example, causes
up to 650,000 deaths (Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development,2019). According to
the World Health Organization (WHO), “health-care
workers are an important priority group for influenza
vaccination [and their immunization] should be
considered part of a broader infection control
policy” (WHO,2012, 475). Therefore, promoting
vaccination among their workers should be a priority
for public healthcare organizations. However, this
is easier said than done and vaccination campaigns
often fall short of expectations because they fail to
factor in the human factor. Leveraging descriptive
social norms could be a viable approach to overcome
this challenge because “people like to do what most
people actually do” (Thaler and Sunstein,2008, 191).
Consequently, the wise use of social nudges may be
crucial to encourage employees to get a flu shot (Van
Bavel et al.,2020) and to advocate vaccination among
colleagues. In addition to effects on others, advocacy
has proven to trigger self-persuasion, a mechanism
whereby individuals who advocate for a behavior
become more likely to engage in that behavior
themselves (Aronson,1999). By using the “social
norm itself [as] a nudge” (Thaler and Sunstein,2008,
259), campaigns that emphasize that most colleagues
get a flu shot can induce more workers to adopt the
same behavior, thus triggering a virtuous cycle.
Similar mechanisms may extend beyond vaccination
to fuel other desired behaviors that public employees
may otherwise engage in at suboptimal levels. In
a series of meetings with over one hundred public
professionals holding managerial responsibilities,
asking for help from colleagues emerged as a
quintessential example of this type of behavior.
Nudging Public Employees Through Descriptive Social
Norms in Healthcare Organizations
Nicola Belle
Paola Cantarelli
Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna
Paola Cantarelli is an Assistant
Professor at Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna
(Management and Healthcare Laboratory,
Institute of Management and Department
EMbeDS, Pisa, Italy). Her research focuses
on behavioral human resource management
and work motivation in mission-driven
organizations.
Email: paola.cantarelli@santannapisa.it
Nicola Belle is an Assistant Professor at
Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna (Management
and Healthcare Laboratory, Institute of
Management and Department EMbeDS,
Pisa, Italy). His research focuses on
behavioral public administration and
management.
Email: nicola.belle@santannapisa.it
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 81, Iss. 4, pp. 589–598. © 2021 by
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13353.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
