NORRIS, RUBY TURNER. The Theory of Consumer's Demand. Pp. xiv, 206. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1941. $3.00

DOI10.1177/000271624222100160
Date01 May 1942
Published date01 May 1942
Subject MatterArticles
221
tries
with
undemocratically
inclined
gov-
ernments,
in
contrast
with
the
military
aggressiveness
of
fascist
invaders
who
used
as
a
spœrhead
the
reactionaries
whom
the
tolerant
Spanish
Republic
had
allowed
to
retain
places
of
military,
economic,
and
ec-
clesiastical
power.
The
world
must
be
saved
from
ruin,
not
by
blindly
allowing
the
wealthy
to
retain
the
position
of
pre-emi-
nence
which
they
have
enjoyed
in
many
times
and
places
in
the
past,
even
if
a
par-
ticular
kind
of
distribution
curve
should
be
found
to
describe
this
pre-eminence
better
than
the
Pareto
curve
fits
the
actual
facts,
but
by
ejecting
from
places
of
military,
economic,
and
political
power
the
fascist-
minded,
antidemocratic
reactionaries
who
have
so
often
been
found
at
these
key
points.
President
Conant
of
Harvard
has
called
for
the
development
of
&dquo;roving
scholars&dquo;
whose
competence
and
activities
should
not
be
confined
by
traditional
departmental lim-
its.
Mathematical
statisticians
perhaps
ap-
proximate
more
closely
than
anyone
else
the
ideal
roving
scholar
who
dips
into
all
sorts
of
things
hitherto
considered
separate
and
distinct.
This
remarkable
book
de-
serves
attention
for
many
reasons,
of
which
one
is
the
fact
that
it
displays
the
work
of
a
brilliant
scholar
whose
roving
has
carried
him
into
more
fields
than
even
H.
G.
Wells
ever
reached,
but
who
has
managed
to
establish
connections
among
these
many
diverse
territories.
HAROLD
HOTELLING
Columbia
University
NORRIS,
RUBY
TURNER.
The
Theory
of
Consumer’s
Demand.
Pp. xiv, 206.
New
Haven:
Yale
University
Press,
1941.
$3.00.
&dquo;The
most
hopeful
development
in
eco-
nomic
theory
for
decades
I
believe
to
be
the
theory
of
monopolistic
competition.
It
has
come
about
largely
through
changed
assumptions
as
to
the
elasticity
of
the
de-
mand
schedule
which
confronts
the
indi-
vidual
producer.
Yet
the
development
which
has
resulted
has
been
concerned
al-
most
wholly
with
supply
factors.
We
still
think
of
market,
normal,
total
or
sellers’
demand
schedules
being
integrated
from
individual
demand
schedules
which
reveal
various
quantities
of
identical
undifferen-
tiated
commodities
a
person
would
take
at
various
possible
prices.&dquo;
Following
this
introductory
paragraph,
the
author
says
that
she
aims
to
develop,
in
this
book,
a
theory
of
demand
on
the
basis
of
much
the
same
assumptions
as
those
used
by
Professor
Chamberlin
and
Mrs.
Robinson.
Just
as
they
have
rewritten
sup-
ply theory
in
terms
of
a
limited
number
of
close
competitors
who
sell
differentiated
products,
so
the
author
endeavors
to
re-
write
the
theory
of
demand
in
terms
of
re-
lated
goods.
The
book
is
divided
into
two
parts
of
unequal
length.
In
Part
One,
Dr.
Norris
briefly
reviews
the
economic
theories
of
demand
of
the
Major
schools
of
thought.
She
points
out
the
limited
extent
to
which
the
various
theories
lend
themselves
to
reality,
i.e.,
to
monopolistic
competition.
She
maintains
that
today
the
frontier
of
economic
theory
consists
of
shifting,
step
by
step,
the
assumptions
upon
which
eco-
nomic
theory
is
built
closer
to
this
reality.
She
attempts
to
push
back
the
frontier
on
the
demand
side
by
developing
a
theory
of
consumer’s
demand
based,
in
so
far
as
she
is
able,
upon
facts.
In
her
preface
and
again
in
the
concluding
chapter
Dr.
Norris
stresses
the
point
that
&dquo;it
is
high
time
that
economists,
like
sociologists,
took
to
the
field,&dquo;
that
is,
&dquo;interview
and
study
the
be-
havior
of
the
practicing
price
setter.&dquo;
And
to
the
extent
that
economic
theory
employs
this
realistic
method,
it
becomes
more
and
more
necessary,
the
author
maintains,
to
analyze
demand
in
concrete
terms.
This
she
tries
to
do,
although
she
states
that
since
&dquo;human
nature
is
always
lurking
in
the
background,
demand
theory
can
never
be
very
fully
treated.&dquo;
In Part
Two,
which
is
more
than
twice
the
length
of
Part
One,
Dr.
Norris
develops
a
theory
of
demand
in
terms
of
related
goods.
She
uses
the
various
analyses
re-
viewed
in
Part
One,
selecting
whatever
one
seems
for
the
purpose
the
most
productive;
at
times,
as
in
her
discussion
of
&dquo;The
Long-
run
Theory
of
Demand&dquo;
in
Chapter
VII,
she
presents
her
conclusion
in
three
ways,
namely:
in
marginal-utility
terms,
in
in-
difference
terms,
and
in
preference-index
terms.
After
pointing
out
that
the
Mar-
at SAGE PUBLICATIONS on December 4, 2012ann.sagepub.comDownloaded from

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT