Nonprofit-Government Relations in Authoritarian China: A Review and Synthesis of the Chinese Literature

AuthorZhibin Zhang,Chao Guo
Published date01 January 2021
Date01 January 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720934891
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720934891
Administration & Society
2021, Vol. 53(1) 64 –96
© The Author(s) 2020
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0095399720934891
journals.sagepub.com/home/aas
Article
Nonprofit-Government
Relations in
Authoritarian China:
A Review and Synthesis
of the Chinese Literature
Zhibin Zhang1 and Chao Guo2
Abstract
This study provides a comprehensive review and synthesis of the Chinese
literature on nonprofit-government relations. A total of 1,222 nonprofit
research articles have been examined. It assesses the key insights and
contributions of nonprofit-government relations studies across macro-,
meso-, and micro-level. It identifies three important limitations of extant
research: the lack of autonomy (i.e., it is state-guided), indigeneity (i.e., it is
largely an exercise of applying Western theories), and sophistication (i.e.,
it has limited theoretical depth and methodological rigor). The middle-
range approach to theory building is suggested as a most appropriate future
direction to advance research in this area.
Keywords
Chinese nonprofit research, nonprofit-government relations, literature review
Introduction
In the past three decades, Chinese scholars have devoted increasing effort to
investigating various aspects of the emerging nonprofit sector in China, with
1Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
Corresponding Author:
Zhibin Zhang, College of Business, Government and Law, Flinders University, Social Science
South 328, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.
Email: zhibin.zhang@flinders.edu.au
934891AASXXX10.1177/0095399720934891Administration & SocietyZhang and Guo
research-article2020
Zhang and Guo 65
a special focus on its relationship with the authoritarian government. Largely
unknown outside of China, this burgeoning scholarship has not only accumu-
lated important data on the scope and functions of the sector but also pro-
vided valuable insights into the nonprofit-government relations. However,
relatively little research has reviewed and synthesized this body of knowl-
edge. In fact, the Chinese literature on nonprofit studies is scattered, being
published in numerous journals with different disciplinary focuses and
spreading across multiple disciplines. It has also gone through a series of
paradigm shifts over time, each marked with fundamental changes of key
concepts and assumptions. To better understand nonprofit-government rela-
tions in the most populous country in the world, it is necessary to conduct a
thorough review and synthesis of this fragmented and evolving research.
Moreover, the existing Chinese literature demands a critical assessment to
evaluate its theoretical and methodological rigor, which would help identify
any problems, weaknesses, contradictions, and controversies within the lit-
erature and suggest future research directions.
Motivated by these needs, this article provides a comprehensive review
of the Chinese literature on nonprofit research. Applying a systematic
review method, we search all potential nonprofit research articles published
in relevant Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI) journals from
1994 to 2015, as well as China Nonprofit Review (CNR)1 from its inception
in 2007 to 2015. We then provide a narrative review of the literature on
nonprofit-government relations retrieved from these articles. Our research
has three objectives. First, we provide a comprehensive overview of the
current knowledge on Chinese nonprofits and nonprofit-government rela-
tions. It involves developing a database of relevant research articles pub-
lished in major Chinese journals. Second, through a narrative synthesis and
critical analysis of the literature on nonprofit-government relations, we
identify the key concepts, theories, arguments, findings, and conclusions
that emerge from this body of knowledge. Third, we discuss future direc-
tions in light of its revealed thematic patterns and key issues identified in
the review analysis.
The rest of this article is organized as follows: the second section provides
a concise review of previous literature syntheses and reviews on the subject.
The third section outlines research methods and data sources. The fourth sec-
tion summarizes the general state of Chinese nonprofit studies and especially
the overall themes of research on nonprofit-government relations. The fifth
section presents findings from a detailed synthesis and analysis of Chinese
studies on nonprofit-government relations. The sixth section identifies the
gaps in the Chinese literature and suggests a future agenda. It concludes in
the last section.
66 Administration & Society 53(1)
Review of Relevant Literature Syntheses
Since the mid-1980s, Chinese scholars have begun to examine the evolving
nonprofit sector through a wide range of theoretical and conceptual perspec-
tives. These efforts have brought forth a growing body of Chinese scholar-
ship on nonprofit organizations and nonprofit-government relations.
However, very few reviews of this literature exist. Several studies summa-
rized the research on Chinese nonprofits and their relationship with the gov-
ernment, but their focuses were on the English literature produced by Western
scholars (Hsu, 2013; Lu, 2009; Smith & Zhao, 2016). B. He (1995) con-
ducted perhaps the earliest review of the Chinese literature on civil society
from 1986 to 1992, documenting the emergence and transformation of the
Chinese discourse on civil society. According to B. He (1995), the idea of
civil society was initially embraced by Chinese intellectuals as a means to get
rid of the Maoist totalitarian regime. After the 1989 incident, it shifted to an
antagonist model which views civil society as a strategy to democratize
China through counterbalancing the authoritarian state, then to a mutual sup-
port model that advocates a supportive relationship between the state and
civil society as a more pragmatic tactic for political changes. In a more recent
review of the Chinese literature on civil society since 2006, J. Yu and Zhou
(2012) examined various conceptual and empirical studies via the common
lens of civil society. They found that the recent Chinese literature focuses on
the impact of three factors on the growth of China’s civil society: the unique
institutional environment, the public or social governance policy framework
adopted by the government to regulate society, and the internet. A few review
studies in Chinese also offered similar critical overviews of this body of the
Chinese literature (W. Chen, 2013; Ji, 2013; Tang, 2012).
Notwithstanding the contributions of these prior reviews, they were mostly
narrative surveys of the selected Chinese literature on nonprofit research.
According to Bearman et al. (2012), a traditional narrative literature review
is framed entirely through the perspective of the author. Hence, it may risk
the author’s biases especially in the literature selection. To fully understand
the state and scope of research in a specific field, it is essential to conduct a
systematic review that covers all relevant work and draws conclusions from
the entire or representative literature. Compared with a narrative review, a
systematic review follows transparent, structured and comprehensive
approaches to searching and analyzing publications. It usually involves a
protocol-based coding process that requires two or more reviewers to synthe-
size research findings and reveal the gaps in current research and identify
future direction. Given its advantages, scholars in public administration and
nonprofit studies have been increasingly adopting the systematic literature

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT