NONLINEAR FORECASTING OF THE GOLD MINER SPREAD: AN APPLICATION OF CORRELATION FILTERS
Author | Christian L. Dunis,Peter W. Middleton,Andreas Karathanasopoulos,Jason Laws |
Date | 01 October 2013 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1345 |
Published date | 01 October 2013 |
NONLINEAR FORECASTING OF THE GOLD MINER SPREAD:
AN APPLICATION OF CORRELATION FILTERS
CHRISTIAN L. DUNIS,
a
JASON LAWS,
b,c
PETER W. MIDDLETON
b,c
*
AND ANDREAS KARATHANASOPOULOS
d
a
Horus PartnersWealth Management Group, Geneva, Switzerland and EmeritusProfessor of Banking and Finance at Liverpool
John Moores University, Hatton Garden, Liverpool, UK
b
University of Liverpool, CIBEF, Liverpool, UK
c
University of Liverpool Management School, University of Liverpool, Chatham Street, Liverpool, UK
d
London Metropolitan University, Holloway Road, London, UK
SUMMARY
This paper models and forecasts the Gold Miner Spread from 23 May 2006 to 30 June 2011. The Gold Miner
Spread acts as a suitable performance indicator for the relationship between physical gold and US gold equity.
The contribution of this investigation is twofold. First, the accuracy of each model is evaluated from a statistical
perspective. Second, various forecasting methodologies are then applied to trade the spread. Trading models
include an ARMA (12,12) model, a cointegration model, a multilayer perceptron neural network (NN), a particle
swarm optimization radial basis function NN and a genetic programming algorithm (GPA).
Results obtained from an out-of-sample trading simulation validate the in-sample back test as the GPA model
produced the highest risk-adjusted returns. Correlation filters are also applied to enhance performance and, as a
consequence, volatility is reduced by 5%, on average, while returns are improved between2.54% and 8.11% across
five of the six models. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: spread trading; multilayer perceptron neural network; particle swarm optimization; radial basis function
neural network;genetic programming algorithm; correlation filter
1. INTRODUCTION
This investigation evaluates the relationship between gold bullion (physical gold) and US gold mining
equity. Historically, the statistical relationship between the two has displayed strong correlation as the
values of gold mining stocks are predominately determined by the price performance of gold. However,
despite this long-term relationship the spread frequently experiences short-term irregularities. When
this occurs an opportunity arises for investors to profit from trading disparities found in the spread be-
tween US gold equity and physical gold.
Owing to market manipulation in the form of Western governments’monetary policies, better known
as quantitative easing, hedgers and investors are turning to alternative and more lucrative investmentsin
order to offset the effects of inflation and to seek profitable trading strategies respectively. At the same
time they are looking to profit in a volatile and highly unpredictable economic climate. In par ticular,
some investors are investing in gold to protect their purchasing power against rising inflation; however,
with gold rising to record highs in 2011, many are now speculating whether this upward trend is losing
* Correspondence to: Peter W.Middleton, University of Liverpool, CIBEF,Liverpool, UK. E-mail: peter.william.middleton@ gmail.com
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN ACCOUNTING, FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT
Intell. Sys. Acc. Fin. Mgmt. 20, 207–231 (2013)
Published online 30 September 2013 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com)DOI: 10.1002/isaf.1345
momentum. Nevertheless, the ‘Gold Miner Spread’may present investors with another long-term alter-
native investment opportunity as it also offers exposure to gold mining stocks. The market offers two
gold miners’exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The first is the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF
(GDX), which provides exposure to large-cap
1
gold miners; the second is the Market Vectors Junior
Gold Miners (GDXJ). The latter has exposure to small-cap
2
gold mining companies. Here, the larger
cap exposure is evaluated by trading the spread between GLD (physical gold) and GDX.
In particular, gold miners use this spread to offset inflation as physical gold is extracted and then ex-
changed for ‘paper’. To hedge against inflation, gold miners ‘long’gold and ‘short’US gold equity to
protect purchasing power of the dollar. Among other variables, inflation is just one of the factors affect-
ing Gold Miners’ability to match the price performance of gold as a physical asset, and hedging on the
financial markets becomes vital to offset systematic risk and maintain profitability.
GDX’s underlyingvalue is derived from stocksand American Depository Receiptsof gold mining com-
panies. Following its inception in 2006 the objective of this ETF has been to replicate the price and yield
performance of the NYSEArca Gold Miners Index (GDM). The net asset valuation of GDX is currently
calculated from 31underlying mining stocks, and thusis a general indicator for the performance of large-
cap US Gold Equity stocks. This ETF is weightedbased on market capitalization, withits larger holdings
being in Barrick Gold Corporation (16.51%), Gold Corp Inc. (13.19%), Newmont Mining Corporation
(11.18%), Kinross Gold Corporation (5.76%), AngloGold Ashanti Ltd (5.60%), Agnico-Eagle Mines
Ltd (4.40%), Randgold Resources Ltd (4.39%) and Yamana Gold Inc. (4.35%).
To gain physical gold exposure many investors are drawn to investing in the SPDR Gold Trust GLD
ETF as this is the most liquid commodity ETF offered on the financial markets. GLD is from the State
Street Global Advisor fund family and was first introduced in 2004 as a means to replicate the price of
gold bullion. As a financial instrument it has provided market participants with exposure to price fluc-
tuations in the commodity while removing risks associated with the delivery of the physical commodity
as well as avoiding storage costs.
Pressures to grow and expand production capacity in the mining industry have been challenged by a
shortage of technical expertise and increasing production costs. Many gold miners have undertaken ex-
pensive and wasteful projects which have eroded profitability. As a result, recent years have seen little
value being returned to shareholders, with much of the capital being spent on project-related activities.
Such wasteful spending has created a drag on gold miners’stock performance relative to the physical
commodity that they produce. In addition, the price of gold has also been affected by monetary policies.
Ultimately, fluctuations in the prices of US gold mining stocks as well as gold create short-term dispar-
ities in the spread from which one can profit by trading effective market timing strategies. With high
inflation and the diminishing purchasing power of the US dollar as a world currency, further analysis
of the Gold Miner Spread is warranted.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
On review of past literature it becomes apparent that few have analysed the advantages of trading the
Gold Miner Spread. Furthermore, the use of nonlinear modelling as a vehicle to forecast next-day
returns is virtually nonexistent within the confines of current academic spread trading literature.
1
Market capitalization greater than $100million with an average tradingvolume of 50,000 sharesduring a 6-month trading period.
2
Includes small to medium-sized mining companies with the majority producing revenues from either gold and/or silver mining.
208 C. L. DUNIS ET AL.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Intell. Sys. Acc. Fin. Mgmt. 20, 207–231 (2013)
DOI: 10.1002/isaf
To continue reading
Request your trial