Nonattest services rule revised based on member feedback.

PositionProfessional Ethics Executive Committee members

Revisions to Interpretation 101-3--Performance of Nonattest Services recently were adopted to provide clarification on the applicability and intent of the rule and ensure its continued effectiveness in promoting independence when a member renders nonattest services to an attest client. The revisions do not relax the rule or change its meaning. The Professional Ethics Executive Committee believed the changes were necessary and appropriate after it became evident, based on feedback from a significant number of members, that a number of Interpretation 101-3's requirements warranted further clarification.

The revisions relate to General Requirement No. 2, regarding a competent employee; General Requirement No. 3, concerning documenting an understanding with the client; and routine activities.

Competency Requirement

The term "competence" has been replaced with the words "suitable skill, knowledge, and/or experience" throughout the interpretation. The term (client) "employee" has been replaced with "individual" to clarify that the person designated by the client to oversee the service could be the owner of the company or an individual outside the company, such as an outsourced bookkeeper or controller.

The committee recognized that members may have needed more clarity as to its intent with respect to the degree of "competence" the individual designated by the client to oversee the nonattest service is expected to possess. Specifically, some mistakenly ascribed a higher standard to this term than intended by the committee and believed that the client was expected to possess the same level of competence as the member. This clearly was not the intent as explained in the guidance, AICPA Interpretation 101-3, Performance of Nonattest Services-Requirement to Document Understanding With an Attest Client [see www.aicpa.org/ download/ethics/Int._10l-3_documentation_guidance.pdf, Nov. 22, 2004]. That guidance, which many members have found helpful to their understanding, specifically defined client competence to mean the individual designated by the client to oversee the nonattest service should possess suitable skill, knowledge, and/or experience to enable him or her to understand the nature, objective and scope of the nonattest service.

Documentation Requirement

Interpretation 101-3 has been revised to reflect that a failure to document the understanding with the client would not be considered to impair a member's independence provided such understanding...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT