Non-proliferation parody.

• Author: Potter, William C.
• Position: Apocalypse When? - Essay

THE ESSAY "Radioactive Hype" by John Mueller makes a number of intriguing and counterintuitive assertions. Most provocatively, it raises questions about the human costs and other unintended consequences of a "non-proliferation first" foreign policy. It also reiterates the important--but now familiar--warning that one should not exaggerate the proliferation threats posed by terrorists or states.

Mueller is correct in highlighting the by-products of past ill-conceived military ventures undertaken in the name of WMD non-proliferation and the potential for similar, if not greater, casualties should military initiatives be launched against other "axis of evil" states. He also is right on, although probably for the wrong reasons, in disputing Graham Allison's forecast about the proliferation chain effects that a North Korean bomb would trigger. (The concept of a "chain reaction" itself is suspect given the process by which states make nuclear decisions.)

A fatal flaw in Mueller's thesis, however, is that the situation he depicts--an alleged U.S. foreign-policy fixation on WMD non-proliferation--bears no resemblance to current U.S. policy. Indeed, the hallmark of the Bush Administration's new approach to nuclear-weapons spread is acquiescence to and management of--rather than prevention of--proliferation. This policy is most evident with respect to the three latest states to test nuclear weapons: India, Pakistan and North Korea. There is little reason to believe that the U.S. response to Iran's nuclear machinations will be any different. Although the administration relishes a tough-guy image and would like the public to believe it employs a set of finely calibrated tools toward each would-be proliferator, the underpinning of its policy is the same--"proliferation is inevitable; learn to live with it." In the case of India, this disregard for non-proliferation has led the administration to jettison nearly three decades of U.S. nuclear export-control policy and to disregard commitments made by the United States when the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty was extended indefinitely in 1995. In the North Korean case, we have returned to a dipolematic status quo ante, with the important exception that Pyongyang now has a much larger stock of nuclear-weapons material and a demonstrated weapons capability.

Mueller's attempt to dismiss the threat posed by nuclear terrorists as alarmist fantasy also falters due to a number of mistaken assumptions...