No need for high speed.

AuthorPeabody
PositionLetter to the editor

Regular trains are more environmentally friendly. It takes less energy to go 100 m.p.h. than 200 m.p.h. High-speed rail is an economic boondoggle. Buses are far cheaper and more flexible, but they don't have the sizzle that politicians and others crave. The California experience should make voters think...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT