No lines online: more states are offering voters the convenience of registering online because it's cheap, easy and increasingly secure.

AuthorUnderhill, Wendy
PositionVOTER REGISTRATION

Online voter registration is a nonpartisan trend with a capital "T."

We know it's a trend because of history: Arizona led the way in 2002, Washington was second in 2008, and today, 17 states offer, or will soon offer, online voter registration. And, legislatures in at least 12 states are considering it this year.

We know it's nonpartisan because it appeals to efficiency-minded lawmakers from both sides of the aisle. Democratic states such as Maryland and Washington have it, and so do Republican states such as Arizona and South Carolina (where it passed unanimously in 2012).

But what exactly is it? What's called online registration or electronic registration is in fact just the opportunity for a citizen to complete an online application for voter registration. (Voters are still welcome to fill out a paper application if they prefer.) As with a paper-based registration, authorities check eligibility before the registration is completed and the voter's data are transferred into the statewide database.

Easy on Voters and a Cost Saver

"I'm a huge fan of online registration because it has made registration easy for our citizens," says Scott Gessler, Colorado's Republican secretary of state. In 2012, Colorado went a step beyond a computer-based online registration process and developed a web-optimized version that makes it possible to register from smartphones and tablets. Gessler also ran a $1 million public education campaign in the summer and early fall---one of the reasons that registrations in the Centennial State jumped 13 percent compared to four years earlier.

"I look at it as a way to increase the franchise as much as possible, but also a way to increase security," says Gessler. By giving people the opportunity to update their own registration record, the system also "cleans up our database at the same time--and we're not doing it by spending a massive amount of state resources."

By state resources, Gessler means money. Setting up online systems has been relatively inexpensive for states. On the low end, Utah spent $37,000 on initial costs, and Oregon characterized its expenses as "minimal." Colorado spent $120,000, mostly for programming. And on the high end, Louisiana estimates it spent $750,000 to $i million; its system includes a number of add-ons, such as the option to request an absentee ballot online. All states report that ongoing expenses are absorbed within existing departments.

The money question is really more about savings...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT