New Ethics Opinion for Attorneys Who Blog, 0117 CABJ, CBJ-January 2017 #04

AuthorLaura Ernde, Staff Writer

New Ethics Opinion for Attorneys Who Blog

No. 2017 #04

California Bar Journal

January, 2017

Laura Ernde, Staff Writer

A new ethics opinion on blogging gives guidance to attorneys who post for fun or for profit, ensuring that they don’t violate the rules regulating attorney advertising.

Not all lawyer blogs are subject to the ethical rules, but those that offer to provide legal services, even implicitly, may be considered advertising, according to Formal Opinion No. 2016-196 (re Attorney Blogging) by the State Bar’s Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct.

The opinion was approved last month by the Board of Trustees.

The opinion has gone through two rounds of public comment since 2015. Although the conclusion remained the same, the final opinion addresses the First Amendment free speech concerns of blogging.

Posts that express the author’s knowledge and opinion on various issues, legal or not, are considered “core or political speech,” it says, making it clear that the opinion is “not intended to chill or limit the protected speech of any lawyer,” but rather to provide guidance to attorneys engaged in blogging.

The revised version also describes an additional hypothetical situation in which the attorney is blogging about legal topics outside of his practice area. Those posts would not...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT