Neo‐liberalism, big business and the evolution of interest group activity in Latin America

Published date01 November 2014
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1439
AuthorAlex E. Fernández Jilberto,Barbara Hogenboom
Date01 November 2014
Special Issue Paper
Neo-liberalism, big business and the
evolution of interest group activity
in Latin America
Barbara Hogenboom
1
*and Alex E. Fernández Jilberto
2
1
Centre for Latin American Research and Documentation (CEDLA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
In the 1980s and 1990s, the conuence of the third wave of democracy, neo-liberal economic reforms and economic
crises in Latin America, produced several signicant consequences for the regions underdeveloped interest group
systems. By using an international political economy approach, this article examines these developments and
particularly how neo-liberal policies affected the political fortunes of big business plus the broader political fall-out
from neo-liberal policies. In essence, we make the argument that, for three reasons, the consequences of the conuence
of these three developments for Latin Americas emerging interest group system are mixed in terms of a more
pluralist, open-access system. First, the inuence of big business persists and in many ways has been enhanced as
the economically and politically privileged position of large private companies since the 1980s has given way to
economic concentration, transnationalization and the rise of multilatinas (Latin American multinational companies,
which primarily operate across the region). Second, political opportunities have been opened for a range of interests,
many from the left, that likely would not otherwise have emerged so early in the region. Third, the election of leaders
opposed to neo-liberal policies may transform Latin Americas political economy and aid in the democratization of its
interest group system. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
INTRODUCTION
The past 30years has seen the development of an
extensive literature on neo-liberalism and its effects
on Latin American politics, and more broadly, on
the regions political economy. This includes studies
of the impact of neo-liberal policies on individual
countries and the fall-out from these policies, such
as the rise of politicianswith anti-neo-liberal agendas.
In contrast, there is little specic analysis of the
effects of neo-liberalism on Latin Americasemerging
interest group systems as they transitioned from the
strictures of authoritarian state corporatism to a
modied corporatism to, in some cases, a edgling
pluralism.
This article attempts to ll this analytical void
by focusing on the effects of neo-liberalism on the role
of one of the long-time political forces in the region
big business. Big business is dened in this article as
large national businesses based in the region as well as
large foreign corporations operating in Latin America.
It is contrasted with small-sized or medium-sized
business that tends to be conned to a particular
locality with a relatively small number ofemployees
and capitalization. Besides neo-liberal policies,
this role of big business was also shaped by the
simultaneous transition to democratic rule and
several economic crises. Thus, in large part, the
analysis in the article is based on an international
political economy assessment of the interaction of
large companies, Latin American economies and the
regions politics with international economic and
political inuences. It shows that the privileged
position of big business since the 1980shas produced
several important changes: economic concentration,
transnationalization and the rise of multilatinas (Latin
American multinational companies, which primarily
operate across the region). In combination, these
simultaneous developments and the political fallout
from neo-liberal policies and the reaction of big busi-
ness to this fallout provide insights into the evolution
of Latin Americas interest group systems in general.
In terms of the developmentof the regions interest
group systems in a directionof the established liberal
democracies, characterized by increased pluralism,
open access and the professionalization of strategies
*Correspondence to: Barbara Hogenboom, Centre for Latin
American Research and Documentation (CEDLA), Amsterdam,
The Netherlands.
E-mail: b.b.hogenboom@cedla.nl
Journal of Public Affairs
Volume 14 Number 3 pp 283295 (2012)
Published online 21 May 2012 in Wiley Online Library
(www.wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/pa.1439
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT