A Multidimensional Perspective on Former Spouses' Ongoing Relationships: Associations With Children's Postdivorce Well‐Being

Published date01 April 2021
AuthorJonathon J. Beckmeyer,Samantha J. Krejnick,Jasmin A. McCray,Jessica Troilo,Melinda Stafford Markham
Date01 April 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12504
J J. B, S J. K,  J A. MCIndiana
University of Public Health–Bloomington
J TWest Virginia University
M S MKansas State University
A Multidimensional Perspective on Former
Spouses’ Ongoing Relationships: Associations
With Children’s Postdivorce Well-Being
Objective: To determine which aspects of
divorced parents’ ongoing relationships with
their former spouses were associated with
children’s and youth’s postdivorce well-being.
Background: Research on the associations
between former spousal relationships and
children’s postdivorce well-being has focused
extensively on postdivorce coparenting, with
less emphasis on other aspects of these multidi-
mensional relationships.
Method: Divorced parents (N=641), recruited
via Amazon MTurk, reported on six aspects of
their relationships with their former spouses
(coparenting cooperation, general communica-
tion with former spouses, boundary ambiguity,
how often they talk with their former spouses,
and satisfaction with custody and child sup-
port), and three indices of postdivorce child
well-being (prosocial, internalizing, and exter-
nalizing behavior).
Results: Analyses were conducted separately
for children (4- to 9-years-old) and youth (10- to
Department of Counseling and Learning Sciences, WestVir-
ginia University, 506 Allen Hall, Morgantown, WV 26506
(jonathon.beckmeyer@mail.wvu.edu).
KeyWords: boundary ambiguity, child well-being, coparent-
ing, divorce, former spouses.
18-years-old). For children, coparenting coop-
eration was associated with more prosocial but
less internalizing behavior; general communi-
cation and boundary ambiguity—family system
were associated with greater externalizing and
internalizing behavior. For youth, boundary
ambiguity—family system was associated with
more externalizing and internalizing behavior,
boundary ambiguity—relationship with former
spouse was associated with more externaliz-
ing behavior, child support satisfaction was
associated with more prosocial behavior, and
custody satisfaction was associated with less
internalizing behavior.
Conclusion: For child and youth postdivorce
well-being, some aspects of former spousal rela-
tionships appear more impactful than others,
with boundary ambiguity appearing particularly
detrimental.
Implications: Divorce education programsmay
need to diversify their content, supplementing
the common focus on postdivorce coparenting
with resources that help parents reduce bound-
ary ambiguity in the family system.
Although parental divorce can be associated
with declines in child well-being, there is
extensive variability in how children adjust to
Family Relations 70 (April 2021): 467–482467
DOI:10.1111/fare.12504
468 Family Relations
parental divorce (Amato, 2010; Cavanagh &
Fomby,2019). Family life educators play impor-
tant roles in promoting children’s postdivorce
resiliency by providing postdivorce education
programs and resources for parents and children
(Crawford et al., 2014; Fackrell et al., 2011).
Perhaps as a reection of the focus cooperative
coparenting has received from researchers, such
programs and resources commonly focus on
helping former spouses establish cooperative
coparenting relationships (Sigal et al., 2011).
Recently, however, researchers have suggested
that postdivorce education programs should
expand their foci to include information about
other dimensions of former spouses’ ongo-
ing relationships (Amato et al., 2011; Russell
et al., 2016). In the present study, we sought
to aid family life educators as they address
those calls by adopting a multidimensional
perspective of former spouses’ ongoing rela-
tionships and testing if multiple aspects of
former spouses’ ongoing relationships were
associated with children’s well-being. Thus,
in the current study, we moved beyond the
common focus on postdivorce coparenting,
conceptualizing former spousal relationships in
terms of general communication between former
spouses (i.e., communication that is not about
children or coparenting), boundary ambiguity,
how often they communicate with each other,
and satisfaction with custody arrangements and
child support. On the basis of family systems
theory (Bortz et al., 2019), we expected that
those qualities, dynamics, and characteristics
would set the stage for children’s adjustment to
postdivorce family life.
Family Systems Perspective
Divorce introduces signicant challenges and
changes across the family system in general,
and to the parental subsystem in particular. For
example, families are tasked with establishing
new family roles, boundaries, and routines
(Emery, 2011; Markham et al., 2017); managing
residential transitions for children (Emery,2011;
Havermans et al., 2017); and adapting to
changes in economic well-being (Cavanagh &
Fomby, 2019). Former spouses also often have
to manage feelings of loss and pain associated
with the end of their marriages (Emery, 2011;
Jamison et al., 2014; Russell et al., 2016).
Because former spouses and their children
still comprise a family system (Adamsons &
Pasley, 2006), if they successfully adjust to
their new family roles and learn to communi-
cate and interact with one another respectfully,
they may be better able to minimize children’s
exposure to interparental conict, provide more
effective parenting, and ensure greater postdi-
vorce family stability (Ahrons, 2011; Lamela
et al., 2016). Conversely, if former spouses are
unable to establish a cordial relationship follow-
ing divorce or they struggle in adapting to their
new family roles, they may experience lower
life satisfaction, mental health challenges, and
parenting stress (Ferraro et al., 2019; Lamela
et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2017), all of which may
make parenting more difcult and negatively
inuence children’s well-being. Therefore, from
a family systems perspective, higher quality
ongoing relationships between former spouses
should create a family context that supports
children’s well-being.
Characteristics and Qualities of Former
Spouses’ Ongoing Relationships
Relationships between former spouses are mul-
tidimensional, involving interactions related to
childrearing, relationship expectations and roles
unrelated to children, the content and frequency
of ongoing communication, and the legal aspects
of divorce. Interactions related to coordinating
children’s care, activities, and needs comprise
the coparenting dimension of former spousal
relationships (Beckmeyer et al., 2017). Postdi-
vorce coparenting is typically conceptualized in
terms of cooperation (i.e., frequently discussing
children’s needs and activities, coordinating
caregiving between households, and mutual par-
enting support; Amato et al., 2011; Beckmeyer
et al., 2014; Troilo & Coleman, 2012). Former
spousal relationships also can vary in their level
of boundary ambiguity (i.e., confusion and
disagreement over the nature of and expecta-
tions for their ongoing relationship; Amato &
Cheadle, 2008; Carroll et al., 2007; Markham &
Coleman, 2012). Ongoing boundary ambiguity
may be due to divorced parents not letting go
of their previous roles as married partners,
the process of redening their relationship
as coparents, or tying to adapt to new family
structures (Jamison et al., 2014; Miller, 2009;
Petronio, 2010).
Communication between former spouses can
be considered in terms of both content and fre-
quency. Although some former spouses limit the

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT