MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE. Left Turn Collision. $______ VERDICT

Pages15-16
The parties reached a settlement in the amount of
$82,000.
REFERENCE
Godfred Barfi vs. Thomas Reeves. Case no. 96-274549-
14; Judge R. H. Wallace, 02-17-15.
Attorney for plaintiff: Rhiamson Kelso of Modjarrad,
Abusaad, Said Law Firm in Richardson, TX. Attorney
for defendant: Kamela A. Wilkinson of Suzanne I.
Calvert & Associates in Dallas, TX.
$10,740 VERDICT
Motor Vehicle Negligence – Intersection collision –
Unsafe lane change – Defendant moves from
passing lane to slow lane and strikes plaintiff’s
vehicle – Negligently making an unsafe lane
change – Neck, shoulder, and back pain –
Headaches
Harris County, TX
The plaintiff, in this vehicular negligence action,
maintained that she suffered serious and
permanent injuries when her car was struck by
the defendant, as the defendant attempted to
make an unsafe lane change. The defendant
denied all allegations of negligence, and that the
plaintiff sustained any serious or permanent
injury as a result of the collision.
On December 31, 2011, the female plaintiff was travel-
ing on Feeder Road 288 in Houston, Texas. At the same
time, the defendant was also traveling on Feeder Road
288, in the lane adjacent to the plaintiff.
Suddenly, and without warning, the defendant at-
tempted to make a lane change into the plaintiff’s lane,
colliding with the driver’s side of the plaintiff’s vehicle. The
plaintiff maintained that the defendant driver was negli-
gent in failing to maintain a proper lookout, failing to sig-
nal a lane change, and making an unsafe lane
change. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant,
Sharma, negligently entrusted her vehicle to the defen-
dant driver. As a result of the collision, the plaintiff was di-
agnosed with cephalgia, headaches, cervical/lumbar
sprain, low back pain, hip sprain, and muscle spasms.
The defendants denied being negligent and causing
the accident, and argued that the actions of the plain-
tiff caused or contributed to the collision.
The defendant also disputed that the plaintiff was seri-
ously or permanently injured in the collision.
The jury found that the defendant was negligent in caus-
ing the collision, and awarded the plaintiff $4,500 in
past pain and suffering, $300 in past wages, $500 in
physical impairment sustained in the past, and $5,440 in
past medicals for a total of $10,740.
REFERENCE
Cinthia Fernandez vs. Ashish Sharma and Satya Sree
Narashima Kolar. Case no. 201376786; Judge Larry
Weiman,
01-26-15.
Attorney for plaintiff: Henry David Drewinko of
Henry D. Drewinko, Attorney at Law in Houston, TX.
Attorney for defendant: Sherra Van Brunt Gilbert of
Soule, Baldwin & Fanaff in Houston, TX.
Left Turn Collision
$148,693 VERDICT
Motor Vehicle Negligence – Left turn collision –
Defendant makes a left turn into a driveway and
strikes plaintiff’s vehicle – Failure to yield right of
way – Hairline fractures of tibias – Emotional
distress
Harris County, TX
In this vehicular negligence action, the plaintiff
maintained that she sustained serious injuries
when the car in which she was riding was struck
on the side, as the defendant attempted a left
hand turn, colliding with the plaintiff’s vehicle.
The defendant generally denied all allegations
contained in the plaintiff’s complaint.
On September 18, 2013, the 54-year-old female plaintiff
was riding as a passenger in a vehicle being driver by
her husband. They were traveling north on the 3100
block of Wilson Road in Houston, Texas. At the same
time and place, the defendant was traveling south on
Wilson Road when he attempted a left hand turn into a
private driveway, colliding with the plaintiff’s vehicle. The
defendant maintained that the defendant was negli-
gent in failing to yield the right of way, failing to make a
proper and safe left hand turn, failing to maintain an
alert and attentive lookout, and traveling at an exces-
sive rate of speed. The plaintiff argued that the negli-
gence of the defendant caused her to suffer multiple
hairline fractures of tibias (bilateral), right ACL injury, chest
contusion, left should sprain and emotional distress. The
defendant proceeding pro se, made a general denial
of liability and injury, and requested a chance to tell his
side of the story in court.
VERDICTS BY CATEGORY 15
Texas Jury Verdict Review & Analysis
Subscribe Now

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT