MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE. Auto/Truck Collision. $______ VERDICT

Pages18-18
DEFENDANT’S VERDICT
Insurance obligation – Alleged breach of
homeowners’ policy – Claimed damage caused by
Tropical Storm Gordon.
Miami-Dade County, FL
In this action, the plaintiffs alleged that the
defendant insurance company breached their
homeowners’ policy by failing to pay for damage
to their Miami, Florida, home caused by Tropical
Storm Gordon. The defendant argued that the
damage in question was caused by wear, tear
and deterioration and was not covered under the
policy issued to the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs alleged that their home sustained extensive
damage on September 3, 2018, when Tropical Storm
Gordon caused an opening in the roof which allowed
rain to enter the property. The plaintiffs’ construction ex-
pert opined that the house exhibited classic windstorm
damages in specific critical areas of the roofing system,
specifically consistent with uplift damage from in-
creased wind force. The defendant maintained that the
plaintiff’s roof was worn and deteriorated and that there
was no evidence of a wind-created opening.
The court instructed the jury that the plaintiffs had the
burden to prove, by the greater weight of the evidence,
that their roof incurred a physical loss to property from
wind due to Tropical Storm Gordon.
The jury found that the plaintiff did not prove that the de-
fendant breached the insurance contract. Accordingly,
a judgment for the defendant was entered. The defen-
dant waived enforcement of the proposals for settle-
ment. The plaintiffs waived post-trial motions or appeal.
REFERENCE
Aleman, et al vs. Citizens Property Insurance Corpora-
tion. Case no. 2020-006863-CA-01; Judge Barbara
Areces, 10-15-21.
Attorneys for defendant: Robert W. Hudson and
Jennifer Santos Roldan of Hudson & Calleja, LLC in
Miami, FL.
MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE
Auto/Truck Collision
$180,033 VERDICT
Motor vehicle negligence – Auto/truck collision –
U-turn collision – Defendant, driving semi-truck
makes U-turn in front plaintiff’s vehicle, colliding
with plaintiff’s vehicle – DVT due to traumatic
injury to left knee – Lifelong blood thinners and
risk of clotting.
Alachua County, FL
In this motor vehicle negligence case, the plaintiff,
a 53-year-old insulation business owner/installer,
asserted that the defendant driver struck his
vehicle with such force that it caused significant,
permanent injury. The defendants stipulated
liability, but contested the plaintiff’s damages.
On July 24, 2019, the plaintiff was traveling on US High-
way 441 in High Springs in the inside lane of travel. The
defendant driver was operating a semi-truck owned by
the co-defendant in the course of his employment, trav-
eling in the outside lane of US Highway 441 ahead of
the plaintiff’s vehicle. The plaintiff contended that the
defendant negligently made an illegal wide U-turn in
front of the plaintiff’s vehicle and struck the vehicle. The
plaintiff alleged that the force of the impact resulted in
permanent injuries.
As a result of the collision, the plaintiff sustained left knee
injury. The plaintiff asserted that he developed deep
vein thrombosis in the left leg as a result of the left knee
injury and has had to take blood-thinning medication
ever since. The plaintiff treated with orthopedic treat-
ment, hematology and podiatric treatment.
The plaintiff presented expert medical testimony that es-
tablished his DVT was provoked by trauma from the sub-
ject accident. The defendants argued that the plaintiff
was not injured or that his injuries were not permanent in
nature. The defendants asserted that the plaintiff suf-
fered from osteoarthritis unrelated to the subject
collision.
The jury found in favor of the plaintiff and against the de-
fendant and awarded damages in the amount of
$180,033 broken down as follows: $10,033 in past medi-
cal expenses; $20,000 in future medical expenses;
$50,000 in past non-economic damages; $100,000 in
future non-economic damages. The court awarded the
plaintiff his taxable costs of $13,753 as the prevailing
party, pursuant to section 57.041 of the Florida Statutes,
for a total recovery of $193,786.
REFERENCE
Patterson vs. Stroup, et al. Case no. 01 2020 CA 001788;
Judge George M. Wright, 12-08-21.
Attorney for plaintiff: Michael Donsky of Dan Newlin
Injury Attorneys in Orlando, FL. Attorney for
defendant: Steven E. Kranz of Adams Coogler, P.A. in
West Palm Beach, FL.
Volume 32, Issue 2, February 2022
VERDICTS BY CATEGORY 18
Subscribe Now

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT