MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE. Auto/Bus Collision. $______ VERDICT

Pages15-16
to announce his arrival, but attempted to just walk in
the house when he was not expected by the
defendant.
The jury found no negligence on the part of the
defendant.
REFERENCE
James Fowler Jr. vs. Gretchen Zavarella. Case no.
GD-12-017130; Judge Alan Hertzberg, 06-02-14.
Attorney for plaintiff: John W. Brown in Pittsburgh,
PA. Attorney for defendant: Kathleen McAllister in
Pittsburgh, PA.
F.E.L.A.
DEFENDANT’S VERDICT
F.E.L.A – Plaintiff injured during training exercise
required by the defendant railroad company –
Negligently exposing the plaintiff to a physical
training exercise that was dangerous – Right
rotator cuff tear – Surgery required.
Philadelphia County, PA
In this Federal Employers Liability Act action, the
plaintiff maintained that he suffered a serious
injury to his right shoulder requiring surgery,
when he was participating in a mandatory
training exercise required of the defendant
railroad. The plaintiff sued the railroad, including
the company that ran the training, alleging
negligence. The defendants denied all liability,
and argued that the plaintiff assumed the risk of
his actions.
On October 19, 2012, the 53 year-old male plaintiff,
who is a police officer with the defendant railroad
company, was engaged in a training exercise with
another police officer. The exercise was a require-
ment of his ongoing training with the railroad com-
pany, and the training session was being run by the
defendant, Controlled F.O.R.C.E. The exercise re-
quired the plaintiff and his partner to sit back to back
and be able to get to a standing position without us-
ing their hands or arms. As the plaintiff and his partner
were pushing up, the plaintiff slipped from his partner
and fell to the ground, sustaining injury. The plaintiff
maintained that both defendants were negligent in
exposing the plaintiff to a physical training exercise
that was dangerous, given the plaintiffsageand
condition, and failing to provide a proper training en-
vironment for the activities required. As a result, the
plaintiff suffered a right rotator cuff tear which re-
quired surgery. The plaintiff is no longer able to per-
form the duties of his job. The defendants denied all
allegations of liability, and argued that the plaintiff
assumed the risk.
The jury found no negligence on the part of either
defendant.
REFERENCE
Edward Ecker vs. National Railroad Passenger Corpo-
ration aka Amtrak, Controlled F.O.R.C.E. Case no.
130101226; Judge Alice Dubow, 05-05-14.
Attorney for plaintiff: Jerry Martillotti of Jerry
Martillotti & Associates in Philadelphia, PA. Attorney
for defendant: Charles McNabb of Law Offices of
Thomas J. Wagner, LLC in Philadelphia, PA. Attorney
for defendant: Joseph Santarone of
Marshall,Dennehey,Warner,Coleman & Googin in
Philadelphia, PA.
MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE
Auto/Bus Collision
$2,025 VERDICT
Motor Vehicle Negligence – Bus Negligence –
Bus pulls up alongside the plaintiff’s stopped
vehicle and sideswipes plaintiff’s vehicle – Failure
to properly operate and control bus – Cervical
sprain.
Philadelphia County, PA
In this vehicular negligence action, the plaintiff
maintained that the defendant bus operator
negligently pulled up next to the plaintiff at an
intersection and sideswiped the plaintiff’s car. The
plaintiff maintained that the defendant
transportation company was vicariously liable for
VERDICTS BY CATEGORY 15
Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review & Analysis
Subscribe Now

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT