Mother–Grandmother and Mother–Father Coparenting Across Time Among Mexican‐Origin Adolescent Mothers and Their Families

Date01 April 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12462
Published date01 April 2018
C L. D Virginia Commonwealth University
A J. U-T Harvard University
K A. U Arizona State University∗∗
L B. J Teachers College, Columbia University∗∗∗
Mother–Grandmother and Mother–Father
Coparenting Across Time Among Mexican-Origin
Adolescent Mothers and Their Families
The current study examined mothers’ reports
of coparenting relationship dynamics (i.e.,
conict, communication) within and between
mother–father and mother–grandmother sub-
systems from 10months postpartum to 5 years
postpartum among 178 Mexican-origin teen
mothers (M age =16.78 years; SD =1.00).
Within subsystems, morefrequent mother–father
coparenting conict was associated with less
frequent mother–father coparenting communi-
cation from 10 months to 5 years postpartum,
and more frequent mother–father coparent-
ing communication was associated with less
frequent mother–father conict from 3 to
Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of
Psychology, DevelopmentalProgram, P.O. Box 842018,
Richmond, VA23284-2018 (clderlan@vcu.edu).
Harvard University Graduate School of Education, 14
Appian Way,Larsen Hall, Cambridge, MA 02138.
∗∗Arizona State University, P.O.BOX 873701, Tempe, AZ
85287-3701.
∗∗∗Teachers College, Columbia University,525 W. 120th
Street, Box 223, New York,NY 10027.
This article was edited by Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan.
Key Words: adolescent pregnancy, coparenting, family
dynamics, Hispanic/Latino/a, longitudinal research.
4 years postpartum. Furthermore,more frequent
mother–grandmother coparenting commu-
nication was associated with less frequent
mother–grandmother conict from 10 months
to 2 years postpartum. Regarding relations
across subsystems, more frequentmother–father
coparenting conict was associated with more
frequent mother–grandmother conict from
10 months to 2 years postpartum, as well as
from 3 to 4 years postpartum. Findings have
implications for future interventions focused on
coparenting relationships within the context of
adolescent parenthood.
The rate of adolescent pregnancy has decreased
in the past decade across all ethnic and racial
groups, but the number of births among Latina
adolescents is still more than double the rate
of non-Latina Black adolescents, and almost
triple the rate of non-Latina White adolescents
(Martin et al., 2011). Furthermore, among all
ethnic and racial groups in the United States,
Mexican-origin adolescents face the highest risk
for pregnancy during adolescence (Martin et al.,
2011). In addition, in 2010 the number of Lati-
nos in the United States reached 16.3% of the
total population, and accounted for more than
Journal of Marriage and Family 80 (April 2018): 349–366 349
DOI:10.1111/jomf.12462
350 Journal of Marriage and Family
56% of the nation’s growth (Passel, Cohn, &
Lopez, 2011). Given this visible increase and
prevalence of the Latino population, coupled
with the disproportionate number of births to
Mexican-origin adolescents, it is important to
focus on processes that impact Mexican-origin
adolescent mothers, their young children, and
their family members as they navigate through
pregnancy and parenting.
One such process is termed coparenting,
which is the shared relationship between two
or more adults who assume responsibility for
the children’s care and upbringing (McHale &
Irace, 2011). Although research on coparenting
is still in its infancy, there has been considerable
growth in this area within the past two decades
(McHale & Lindahl, 2011), particularly in terms
of the links between coparenting and children’s
and coparents’ outcomes. For example, in terms
of children’s outcomes, previous work indicated
that greater coparenting competitiveness was
associated with infants’ less secure attachment to
their parents (Caldera & Lindsey, 2006); greater
hostile-withdrawn coparenting was related
to preschool children’s greater delinquency,
withdrawal, anxiety, and depression (Katz &
Low, 2004); higher coparenting conict was
linked with young children’s decreased math
scores, literacy scores, and social skills (Cabre-
ra, Scott, Fagan, Steward-Streng, & Chien,
2012); and higher supportive coparenting was
linked with children’s positiveadjustment, more
broadly (Teubert & Pinquart, 2010). In terms
of coparents’ outcomes, previous research has
indicated that a lower quality coparenting rela-
tionship (e.g., undermining) between mothers
and fathers was associated with more depressive
symptoms and parenting stress, less parenting
efcacy (Solmeyer & Feinberg, 2011), and
less father involvement (Carlson, McLana-
han, & Brooks-Gunn, 2008). In addition to
mother–father coparenting relationships and
outcomes, other work has examined whether
coparenting between mothers and their own
mothers (i.e., children’s grandmothers) was
related to coparents’ outcomes. Findings indi-
cated that greater coparenting quality was
associated with mothers’ (Kalil, Spencer,
Spieker, & Gilchrist, 1998) and grandmothers’
decreased depressive symptoms (Caldwell,
Antonucci, & Jackson, 1998).
Despite the emerging body of literature
indicating that features of the coparenting
relationship have implications for individuals’
adjustment, little is known about how aspects of
the adolescent mother–grandmother coparenting
relationship and the adolescent mother–father
coparenting relationship are associated with one
another over time. Given that these relation-
ships among coparents do not occur in isolation
from one another, examining the family system
more holistically can provide a more accurate
reection of adolescent mothers’ experiences.
Guided by family systems theory (Cox &
Paley, 1997), the current study examined the
extent to which (a) mothers’ reports of the
frequency of coparenting communication and
conict were associated with each other over
time within the mother–grandmother subsys-
tem and within the mother–father subsystem,
and (b) mothers’ reports of the frequency of
coparenting communication and conict across
the mother–grandmother and mother–father
subsystems were associated with each other
over time.
Understanding more about coparenting
among various coparents as young mothers nav-
igate parenting during the developmental period
of adolescence is important. Adolescence is
characterized by numerous normative develop-
mental processes, including an increased desire
for autonomy, greater emphasis on acceptance
from similar-aged peers, and the search for
an understanding of self (De Goede, Branje,
Delsing, & Meeus, 2009; Erikson, 1968) that
may have implications for their coparenting
relationships. Adolescents’ increased desire for
autonomy, for example, may conict with their
need for support from their mothers as they
navigate being a young parent. Furthermore,
the salience of peer relationships in adolescence
may mean that adolescent mothers place a
stronger emphasis on their coparenting rela-
tionship with their child’s father, above their
coparenting relationship with their mothers.
Because adolescent mothers are navigating nor-
mative developmental tasks while establishing
coparenting relationships with multiple copar-
ents, this is a unique developmental context in
which to examine coparenting and one that is
likely to be distinct from the context of adult
coparenting relationships.
T F S  F W
A M
Family systems theory (Cox & Paley, 1997;
Minuchin, 1985) proposes that a family is a

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT