Mortality effects of temperature changes in the United Kingdom

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/for.2473
Date01 November 2017
Published date01 November 2017
Received: 13 December 2016 Revised: 2 March 2017 Accepted: 13 March 2017
DOI: 10.1002/for.2473
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Mortality effects of temperature changes in the United Kingdom
Malgorzata Seklecka1Athanasios A. Pantelous1Colin O’Hare2
1Department of Mathematical Sciences,
University of Liverpool, UK
2Department of Econometrics and Business
Statistics, Monash University,Melbour ne,
Australia
Correspondence
Athanasios A. Pantelous, Department of
Mathematical Sciences, University of
Liverpool, Peach Street, Liverpool L69 7ZL,
UK.
Email: a.pantelous@liverpool.ac.uk
Funding information
EPSRC and ESRC Centre for Doctoral
Training on Quantification and Management
of Risk & Uncertainty in Complex Systems
& Environments, Grant/AwardNumber:
EP/L015927/1
Abstract
Temperature changes are knownto affect the social and environmental determinants
of health in various ways. Consequently, excess deaths as a result of extreme weather
conditions may increase over the coming decades because of climate change. In this
paper, the relationship between trends in mortality and trends in temperature change
(as a proxy) is investigatedusing annual data and for specified (warm and cold) peri-
ods during the year in the UK. A thoughtful statistical analysis is implemented and
a new stochastic, central mortality rate model is proposed. The new model encom-
passes the good features of the Lee and Carter (Journal of the American Statistical
Association, 1992, 87: 659–671) model and its recent extensions, and for the very
first time includes an exogenous factor which is a temperature-related factor. The
new model is shown to provide a significantly better-fitting performance and more
interpretable forecasts. An illustrative example of pricing a life insurance product is
provided and discussed.
KEYWORDS
climate change (temperature), forecasting, Lee–Carter model, longevity, pricing life annuity, United
Kingdom population
1INTRODUCTION
It is a remarkable achievement that, owing to the recent
advances in science and technology, humans are living
on average longer than ever before. Comparing the life
expectancy at the beginning of the 21st century with that at the
middle of the 18th century, it can be seen that life expectancy
has increased by over 30 years in a period of less than 200
years. This is an impressive achievement if someone also
considers that lifespan increased by 25 years over the previ-
ous 10,000 years (Niu & Melenberg, 2014; Pitacco, Denuit,
Haberman, & Olivieri, 2009). Obviously, as a direct conse-
quence, longevity risk is and will be a key issue for the future
of individuals, governments, and financial institutions. Thus
appropriate mortality modeling and accurate forecasting are
becoming increasingly important.
The climate, which is always a key parameter in the com-
plexity of the Earth’s system, and changesin average tempera-
ture may impact on life expectancyin various ways. Scientific
consensus indicates that climate change is likely to cause a
range of direct and indirect effects on human health in devel-
oped and developing countries (Easterling et al., 2000; Field
et al., 2014). The World Health Organization suggests that
between 2030 and 2050 climate change is expected to cause
approximately 250,000 additional deaths per year, because of
malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea, and heat stress (WHO, 2014).
Researchers across the world haveinvestigated links between
mortality and temperature changes. Results from these stud-
ies show that the magnitude of temperature that is related
to deaths varies between countries (Analitis et al., 2008;
Gasparrini et al., 2015; Meehl & Tebaldi, 2004) and popula-
tion groups. According to Hajat, Vardoulakis, Heaviside, and
Eggen’s (2014) findings, the most vulnerable age group is
elderly people. In addition, Christidis, Donaldson, and Stott
(2010) suggested that the ability of individuals or cohorts
to adapt is a major influence on changing mortality rates.
At the same time, absence of adaptation can result in cli-
mate being a main contributor to increases in heat- and
824 Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/for Journal of Forecasting.2017;36:824–841.
SEKLECKA ET AL.825
cold-related mortality in comparison to an intermediate
“comfortable” temperature range (Patz, Campbell-Lendrum,
Holloway, & Foley, 2005; McMichael, Woodruff, & Hales,
2006).
One of the main goals of this paper is to examine for the
very first time (according to the authors’ knowledge), the
relationship between trends in mortality and trends in tem-
perature change (as a proxy for climate change) that can
be observed for annual data and for more specified (warm
and cold) periods during the year in the UK over the period
1974–2011. Consequently, we propose and explore the rela-
tionship between the time-dependent factor of the Lee and
Carter (1992) model (hereafter referred to as the LC model)
k1
t, and the logarithm of the average temperature for males
and females at ages between 20 and 85+. What is more,
we investigate the long-run relationship among time series
data using the Johansen (1988) cointegration test. Addition-
ally, we check correlation between those factors according to
various tests. We also use Pearson’s correlation coefficient
to analyze behavior between age-specific mortality rates and
averagetemperatures. Results of our investigation suggest that
there is a long-run relationship between the mortality index
and average temperature changes as we observe strong nega-
tive correlation coefficients. Additionally, similar results are
obtained from the analysis of mortality rates (by ages) and
average temperature fluctuations. The analysis of the statis-
tical results gives us a strong foundation and motivation to
investigate further this relationship. Thus we introduce a new
stochastic central mortality rates model by extending Plat’s
(2009) and O’Hare and Li’s (2012) approaches and imple-
menting an additional temperature-related factor to capture
temperature fluctuations. Furthermore, by using the mortality
rates produced by the proposed new model, as an illustrative
example, the present actuarial value of a lifeinsurance product
(more precisely, for nyears’ annuity) is calculated and com-
pared with results derived from existing, standard mortality
models. Additionally, the forecastingoutcomes from the pro-
posed model using autoregressive integrated moving average
(ARIMA) and exponential smoothing methods are reported.
Obviously, the stepping stone for our research is the cele-
brated mortality model introduced by Lee and Carter (1992).
Additionally, since we want to include advantageous features
of other existing extensions of the LC model, we also con-
sider the ideas of Plat’s (2009) and O’Hare and Li’s (2012)
models (hereafter referred to as the P and OL model, respec-
tively). The proposed new model takes into account all the
advantageous aspects of previous models and also includes
the temperature-related factor. It performs better when it is
compared with the above mortality models and gives very
good forecasting results. Mortality rates produced by the new
model also improve the valuation and pricing accuracy of
actuarial products.
The organization of the paper is as follows. In Section 2,
we briefly review the main models considered in this study,
and the relationship between climate (temperature) changes
and mortality rates is investigated. Additionally, Section 3
focuses on the statistical analysisof t he data from the National
Offices for Statistics, and the Met Office for the UK popula-
tion. Results on the long-run relationship among time series
data using the Johansen (1988) cointegration test, and corre-
lation according to various tests can be found. In Section 4
the new temperature-related model is introduced, and the fit-
ting estimation is discussed. Forecasting performance using
the ARIMA process and exponential smoothing is consid-
ered in Section 5. Results regarding the financial impact
are presented in Section 6. Finally, Section 7 concludes the
discussion in this paper.
2LITERATURE REVIEW
Mortality modeling and, in particular, the accurate forecast-
ing of mortality rates has a very long history. Probably the
first person who considered a scientific approach to mortality
data was Edmund Halley in 1693. Early mortality tables were
deterministic and static in nature and did not take account of
potential future improvements in mortality rates over time.
We can observe two main approaches in modeling mortal-
ity rates over time: extrapolative and explanatory.However,
in the corresponding literature we find that the vast major-
ity of mortality forecasting methods are extrapolative. They
make use of the observable patterns and trends over time
and forecast these into the future. The second approach (i.e.,
explanation) takes into account relationships between mortal-
ity and medical diseases or risk factors. It relies on medical
knowledge, information on behavioral or environmental fac-
tors (e.g., the dependence of lung cancer on tobacco smok-
ing), and the use of structural or epidemiological models of
mortality from certain causes of death where the key exoge-
nous variables are known and can be measured. We can also
find one more forecasting method in the literature based on
subjective expectation (Booth & Tickle, 2008). This approach
is one adopted by experts in the field, for example, actuaries.
Obviously, each of those methods has advantages and dis-
advantages and it is difficult to say which one is better. In
addition, comparison of outcomes from different approaches
is hampered by differences in the explicit assumptions—for
example, the choice of length of the historical period. In this
paper, we combine extrapolation and explanation by consid-
ering well-known models and improving them by adding the
new temperature-related factor.
2.1 Extrapolative mortality modeling
The initial step in developing a mortality model came from
the early mortality laws originated by fitting a mathematical

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT