Mortality Dependence and Longevity Bond Pricing: A Dynamic Factor Copula Mortality Model With the GAS Structure

Date01 April 2017
AuthorTao Sun,Hua Chen,Richard D. MacMinn
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12214
Published date01 April 2017
MORTALITY DEPENDENCE AND LONGEVITY BOND
PRICING:ADYNAMIC FACTOR COPULA MORTALITY
MODEL WITH THE GAS STRUCTURE
Hua Chen
Richard D. MacMinn
Tao Sun
ABSTRACT
Modeling mortality dependence for multiple populations has significant
implications for mortality/longevity risk management. A natural way to
assess multivariate dependence is to use copula models. The application of
copula models in the multipopulation mortality analysis, however, is still in
its infancy. In this article, we present a dynamic multipopulation mortality
model based on a two-factor copula and capture the time-varying
dependence using the generalized autoregressive score (GAS) framework.
Our model is simple and flexible in terms of model specification and is
widely applicable to high dimension data. Using the Swiss Re Kortis
longevity trend bond as an example, we use our model to estimate the
probability distribution of principal reduction and some risk measures such
as probability of first loss, conditional expected loss, and expected loss. Due
to the similarity in the structure and design of CAT bonds and mortality/
longevity bonds, we borrow CAT bond pricing techniques for mortality/
longevity bond pricing. We find that our pricing model generates par
spreads that are close to the actual spreads of previously issued mortality/
longevity bonds.
INTRODUCTION
Mortality improvements around the world are putting more and more pressure on
social security systems, pension funds, life insurance companies, and individuals,
and thus call for more efficient management of longevity risk. Coping with this trend,
longevity risk-related capital market solutions have grown in recent years. Many
innovative products, such as mortality/longevity bonds, longevity swaps, buy-ins,
and buy-outs, have been adopted (Tan, Blake, and MacMinn, 2015). A better
understanding of the correlation among mortality improvements for multiple
Hua Chen is at the Temple University. Hua Chen can be contacted via e-mail: hchen@temple.edu.
Richard D. MacMinn is at the National Chengchi University and University of Texas. Richard D.
MacMinn can be contacted via e-mail: richard@macminn.org. Tao Sun is at University of
Wisconsin–La Crosse. Tao Sun can be contacted via e-mail: tsun@uwlax.edu.
© 2017 The Journal of Risk and Insurance. Vol. 84, No. S1R, 393–415 (2017).
DOI: 10.1111/jori.12214
393
populations appears to be critical for issuers, investors, insurers, pension plans, and
governments for several reasons (Cairns et al., 2011; Chen, MacMinn, and Sun, 2015).
First, almost all mortality/longevity bonds are written on a weighted index based on
the mortality experience of multiple populations. Issuers (or sponsors) need to
understand mortality correlations in order to better design the mortality/longevity
derivatives and price the premiums. Investors also need to analyze the mortality
correlations to evaluate their risk and payoff. Second, life insurers that write both life
insurance policies and annuities can naturally hedge mortality risk from insured lives
with longevity risk from annuitants. Such a natural hedge, however, is not perfect.
Therefore, insurers need to understand mortality correlations between these two
groups and manage the residual risk. Third, for mortality/longevity risk hedgers that
use capital market instruments, basis risk exists because the mortality experience of
their own population is usually different from that of the population(s) associated
with the standardized hedging instruments. A model that captures mortality
dependence among multiple populations can help them determine hedge ratios and
minimize basis risk.
1
There has been a growing lite rature on mortality mode ls for multiple populatio ns
in recent years (see, e. g., Li and Lee, 2005; Cair ns et al., 2011; Dowd et al ., 2011;
Jarner and Kryger, 2011; Li an d Hardy, 2011; Yang and Wang, 201 3; Zhou, Li, and
Tan, 2013; Zhou et al., 2014). The se models typically assume th at the forecasted
mortality experience s of two or more related popula tions are linked together an d
do not diverge over the long run. This assumption might be justified by the long-
term mortality comoveme nts. There is, however, litt le evidence to suggest mean
reversion to a constant di fference in relative mortality rates in the short run ( Hunt
and Blake, 2015). Mackenb ach et al. (2003) and Waldron (2007) also document a
divergence in mortality be tween different socioeco nomic groups in recent years .
We, therefore, develop o ur multipopulation mor tality model following a nother
stream of dependence mod eling, that is, copulas . We introduce a time-var ying
dependence structure using the generalized autor egressive score (GAS) mode l. We
use the Kortis longevity bo nd, the first longevity trend bond issued by Swiss Re in
2010, as an example to illu strate how this model can be used for mortality risk
modeling and pricing.
Copulas have been studied in both actuarial science and finance to examine
dependencies among risks (Frees and Valdez, 1998; Embrechts, Lindskog, and
McNeil, 2003). In mortality studies, copulas have been applied to model the bivariate
survival function of the lives of couples (see, e.g., Frees, Carriere, and Valdez, 1996;
Carriere, 2000; Denuit et al., 2001; Shemyakin and Youn, 2006). Surprisingly, the
application of copula models in the multipopulation mortality analysis is still in its
1
Another application of multipopulation mortality models is to forecast mortality for a small
country. Sometimes the mortality data may not be available or reliable for a small population
due to a small number of deaths, a limited number of calendar years of data, age range, or poor
data quality. Jointly estimating the small population and a larger linked population allows the
small-population mortality forecasts to be consistent with those of the larger population. Due
to the space restriction, we do not discuss this application in this article. We refer interested
readers to Dowd et al. (2011).
394 THE JOURNAL OF RISK AND INSURANCE

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT