A modified sequential Monte Carlo procedure for the efficient recursive estimation of extreme quantiles

Published date01 August 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/for.2568
Date01 August 2019
Received: 6 June 2018 Revised: 3 September 2018 Accepted: 3 January 2019
DOI: 10.1002/for.2568
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A modified sequential Monte Carlo procedure for the
efficient recursive estimation of extreme quantiles
Serdar Neslihanoglu1Paresh Date2
1Department of Statistics, Faculty of
Science and Letters, Eskisehir Osmangazi
University, Eskisehir,Turkey
2Department of Mathematics, College of
Engineering, Design and Physical
Sciences, Brunel University, London, UK
Correspondence
Serdar Neslihanoglu, Department of
Statistics, Faculty of Science and Letters,
Eskisehir Osmangazi University,Meselik
Yerleskesi,26480 Eskisehir, Turkey.
Email: sneslihanoglu@ogu.edu.tr
Funding information
Eskisehir Osmangazi University Scientific
Research Fund (ESOGU BAP),
Grant/AwardNumber: 201519046
Abstract
Many applications in science involve finding estimates of unobserved variables
from observed data, by combining model predictions with observations. The
sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) is a well-established technique for estimating
the distribution of unobserved variables that are conditional on current observa-
tions. While the SMC is very successful at estimating the first central moments,
estimating the extreme quantiles of a distribution via the current SMC methods
is computationally very expensive. The purpose of this paper is to develop a new
framework using probability distortion. We use an SMC with distorted weights
in order to make computationally efficient inferences about tail probabilities of
future interest rates using the Cox–Ingersoll–Ross (CIR) model, as well as with
an observed yield curve. We show that the proposed method yields acceptable
estimates about tail quantiles at a fraction of the computational cost of the full
Monte Carlo.
KEYWORDS
extreme event simulation, risk analysis, sequential Monte Carlo, simulation
1INTRODUCTION
This study concerns the problem of estimating the latent
states of a dynamic system from observed time series data.
Such problems arise in many branches of the physical and
social sciences, including the geosciences, navigation, and
econometrics. Filtering is an indefinitely repetitive proce-
dure of merging model predictions and noisy observations
for the purpose of making estimates. The estimate of a state
at a particular point in time is a probability distribution
(conditional upon the observations that have been made
up to that time) which is, in some cases, characterized by
its first few central moments. The Kalman filter (Kalman,
1960) is a commonly used estimator for linear systems.
Provided that the conditional densities are Gaussian and
that the Kalman filter is used as a closed-form solution, the
Kalman filter is most satisfactory.
When a system is nonlinear,a stochastic partial differen-
tial equation solution must typically be solved in order to
generate a conditional distribution. A numerical solution
for such an equation is often intractable. This is espe-
cially the case when a real-time solution is being sought
(e.g., in navigation and tracking) or when the state or the
observation dimension is high (e.g., in the geosciences
or econometrics). Nonlinear filtering in different disci-
plines requires various Bayesian approximation methods,
each of which require concessions to the accurate estima-
tion and computational loads that are particular to those
implementations. To illustrate, the extended Kalman fil-
ter (EKF) (Anderson & Moore, 1979) and the unscented
Kalman filter (UKF) (Julier & Uhlmann, 2004), as well as
their variants as cited in Date, Jalen, and Mamon (2008)
and Date, Mamon, and Jalen (2010), can all be listed
as different approximation methods. A sequential Monte
Carlo (SMC), also called a particle filter, extends a dis-
crete approximation of conditional density. The SMC can
also be used as a recursive procedure for approximation
of the conditional density at random together with novel
390 © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/for Journal of Forecasting. 2019;38:390–399.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT