Minds, Hearts, and Bodies, Not Data Points: A Response to Harris, McDonald, and Sparks’s “Sexual Harassment in the Military: Individual Experiences, Demographics, and Organizational Contexts”
DOI | 10.1177/0095327X18767090 |
Published date | 01 July 2019 |
Date | 01 July 2019 |
Author | Connie A. Buscha |
Subject Matter | Commentaries |
Commentary
Minds, Hearts, and
Bodies, Not Data Points:
A Response to Harris,
McDonald, and Sparks’s
“Sexual Harassment in
the Military: Individual
Experiences, Demographics,
and Organizational
Contexts”
Connie A. Buscha
1
Abstract
Harris, McDonald, and Sparks’s recent quantitative research article, Sexual Harass-
ment in the Military: Individual Experiences, Demographics, and Organizational Contexts,
does not deliver its title’s promises. In 2018, social science research investigating,
describing, and, ultimately, impacting human lives has advanced beyond overly
simplistic figures of data points on x- and y-axes and rhetorical findings. Therefore,
this response challenges numerous aspects of Harris, McDonald, and Sparks’s arti-
cle. It identifies pragmatism as a valuable theoretical perspective from which to
investigate the phenomenon of sexual harassment in the military. It further asserts
that a qualitative methodology best provides rich, nuanced, and descriptive data
from which researchers and scholars can identify measures to mitigate negative
experiences for all service members regardless of gender.
1
Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA
Corresponding Author:
Connie A. Buscha (formerly Connie A. Brownson), Texas State University, Evans Liberal Arts, Room 139,
San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.
Email: cb60716@txstate.edu
Armed Forces & Society
2019, Vol. 45(3) 561-571
ªThe Author(s) 2018
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0095327X18767090
journals.sagepub.com/home/afs
To continue reading
Request your trial