MEDICAL MALPRACTICE. Neurology. $______ RECOVERY

Pages9-9
VERDICTS BY CATEGORY
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
Neurology
$375,000 RECOVERY
Medical malpractice – Neurology negligence –
Defendants fail to appreciate symptoms of shunt
malfunction in plaintiff’s decedent causing
intracranial pressure and brain damage –
Wrongful death of 44-year-old male.
Dauphin County, PA
The estate of the decedent brought this medical
malpractice action against the defendant doctors
and hospital system that treated the decedent for
Chiari II malformation. After a shunt revision
procedure performed by the defendants, the
decedent began to experience symptoms of shunt
malfunction which the defendants did not
appreciate and address. The shunt was indeed
malfunctioning and pressure built up in the
decedent’s brain causing brain damage and
ultimately death. The defendants denied all
allegations of negligence and maintained that the
decedent was properly treated in accordance with
all standards.
The plaintiff’s decedent was born in 1973 with Chiari II
Malformation. A VP shunt was placed in the dece-
dent’s brain at age 3 to address the hydrocephalus.
In February 2014, the defendant Moore performed a
revision to the shunt. In late March of 2014, the dece-
dent returned to working full time at Home Depot
without restrictions. The decedent was capable of all
aspects of independent living and only required the
use of a wheelchair and a vehicle with hand controls.
Beginning in May of 2014, the decedent began suf-
fering dizziness and headaches. Despite these con-
cerning signs of VP shunt malfunction, the defendant
Moore did not address the possibility of malfunction.
Additional symptoms of shunt malfunction including
indigestion, facial numbness, blurry vision, fatigue
and memory loss occurred throughout 2014 and
2015. Defendant Moore assured the plaintiff and his
family that he was the leading expert on shunts and
that the decedent’ shunt was not malfunctioning;
rather, he treated the decedent for obstructive hydro-
cephalus, cervical spondylosis and sent the dece-
dent to an ophthalmologist for vision issues. In 2015,
the decedent continued to suffer symptoms of shunt
malfunction and was seen by various doctors of the
Pinnacle Health System; none of whom suspected
shunt malfunction.
In March of 2016, the decedent presented to the de-
fendant Skinner with vision loss and headaches. The
decedent was no longer able to drive. Defendant
Powers suspected a blockage of spinal fluid and per-
formed a craniotomy on the decedent on April 21,
2016. Following surgery, the decedent was found un-
responsive by the nursing staff. An evaluation of the
shunt was then performed and thought to be in ques-
tionable operation. On April 25th, Powers performed
surgery to replace the shunt. During the procedure,
Powers determined that the shunt had likely been
malfunctioning for an “ongoing period of time.” The
plaintiff’s decedent suffered significant brain damage
and remained in a semi-comatose condition until his
death on July 29, 2017.
The decedent’s estate, his father, maintained that the
defendants failed to acknowledge and properly in-
vestigate signs and symptoms of shunt malfunction,
failed to properly consider shunt malfunction as the
cause for the plaintiff’s symptoms, failed to recognize
the extent and severity of the plaintiff’s condition and
increased the likelihood of harm to the decedent
and caused his death. All defendants denied all alle-
gations of negligence. Defendants maintained that
they acted within a respected school of thought in
their treatment of the decedent within the standards
of care.
The parties settled for a lump sum of $375,000.
REFERENCE
The Estate of Stephen L. Hutton by Charles Hutton vs.
Barry G. Moore, M.D., UPMC Pinnacle, Pinnacle
Health Hospitals, Stephen K. Powers, M.D. Case no.
2018-CV-2109; Judge John F. Cherry, 12-17-21.
Attorney for plaintiff: James R. Moyles of The Law
Office of James R. Moyles in Lemoyne, PA. Attorney
for defendant: Michael Badowski of Margolis
Edelstein in Camp Hill, PA.
Volume 37, Issue 6, June 2022
9
Subscribe Now

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT