A market reaction to DOD contract delay — Does the market reward poor performance?

AuthorRobert Carden,Sonia E. Leach,Jeffrey S. Smith
Published date20 February 2007
Date20 February 2007
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2007.02.004
A market reaction to DOD contract delay Does the market
reward poor performance?
Robert Carden, Sonia E. Leach, Jeffrey S. Smith
Department of Systems Engineering and Management, Air Force Institute of Technology, United States
Received 15 May 2006; accepted 1 February 2007
Available online 20 February 2007
Abstract
Civilian development projects occur faster than projects for the Department of Defense (DoD). Faster
development either means quicker delivery (i.e. sales), or for DoD, it means a more capable warfighter. On
average, DoD Acquisition Category One (ACAT I) development projects now take 15 years, an increase of 20%.
These same companies producing civilian products faster fail to do so with their DoD contracts. This paper
examines the relationship between DoD delay and its impact on shareholder wealth. The results show positive,
significant wealth for shareholders at the announcement of a DoD delay, suggesting an insensitivity toward such
production delays.
© 2007 Published by Elsevier Inc.
JEL classification: G14; H57; L21
Keywords: Acquisition; DoD; Lean; Event study
1. Introduction
Over the past 40 years, there has been a steady increase in the time it takes an acquisition program to
produce a weapon system for the warfighter. McNutt (1998) described the magnitude of this problem by
Review of Financial Economics 17 (2008) 3345
www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase
The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States
Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States Government.
Corresponding author. Air Force Institute of Technology, Bldg. 640, Room 103b, 2950 Hobson Way, Wright-Patterson AFB
OH 45433, United States. Tel.: +1 937 255 3636x7393; fax: +1 937 656 4699.
E-mail address: jeffrey.smith@afit.edu (J.S. Smith).
1058-3300/$ - see front matter © 2007 Published by Elsevier Inc.
doi:10.1016/j.rfe.2007.02.004

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT