Market Power, Exclusive Rights, and Substitution Effects in Sports

Published date01 September 2016
DOI10.1177/0003603X16657228
Date01 September 2016
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Market Power, Exclusive Rights,
and Substitution Effects in Sports
Brian M. Mills* and Jason A. Winfree**
Abstract
This articles argues that consumers of professional sports leagues are not always better off with more
sellers because market power can be exerted in many ways. In the presence of one governing body,
allowing individual firms to sell a product can be more harmful than a monopoly. Some recent antitrust
lawsuits dealing with North American sports leagues have focused on collective sales through the
league compared with competitive sales through teams. This paper gives examples where it is not clear
that team sales are better than league sales. Furthermore, we argue that market power depends largely
on fan substitution within and across leagues, including NCAA sports. We give a summary of recent
research in the area of fan substitution, and suggest directions for future work on understanding
substitutability and impacts on market power of professional and collegiate sports teams.
Keywords
sports leagues, substitution, competition
Introduction
In 2012, liquor sales in Washington State went from being sold directly from state-run liquor stores to
privatization, where liquor was sold in grocery stores. This initiative was passed by voters, and a
primary argument behind this legislation was that liquor prices would decrease since sales were going
from a state-run monopoly to the very competitive grocery store industry. But to the surprise of many
consumers, prices actually spiked up once the policy went into place.
1
The reason for this was that the
state did not want to lose money under the new legislation, so they initiated a series of taxes and fees on
liquor that more than made up for the price decrease via competition. So while liquor sales did
*Department of Tourism, Recreation, & Sport Management, College of Health & Human Performance, University of Florida,
Gainesville, FL, USA
**Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Idaho,
Moscow, ID, USA
Corresponding Author:
Brian M. Mills, Department of Tourism, Recreation, & Sport Management, College of Health & Human Performance, University
of Florida, P.O. Box 118208, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Email: bmmillsy@hhp.ufl.edu
1. See Vanessa Ho, Liquor Sticker Shock: Why Is Booze So Expensive? SEATTLE PI, May 31, 2012, http://blog.seattlepi.com/
seattlepolitics/2012/05/31/liquor-sticker-shock-why-is-booze-so-expensive/#5511101¼0.
The Antitrust Bulletin
2016, Vol. 61(3) 423-433
ªThe Author(s) 2016
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0003603X16657228
abx.sagepub.com

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT