Managerial Practice and Diversity Climate: The Roles of Workplace Voice, Centralization, and Teamwork

Published date01 May 2022
AuthorZhongnan Jiang,Leisha DeHart‐Davis,Erin L. Borry
Date01 May 2022
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13494
459
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited,
the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Zhongnan Jiang
Leisha DeHart-Davis
Erin L. Borry
Managerial Practice and Diversity Climate: The Roles of
Workplace Voice, Centralization, and Teamwork
Abstract: Diversity climate—shared employee perceptions of the extent to which an organization is inclusive and
fair—is of increasing interest to public administration scholars. While research has linked diversity climate to a range
of employee and organizational outcomes, less is known about how common managerial practices affect diversity
climate. This article addresses this gap by examining three such practices: workplace voice, centralized decision-
making, and teamwork. Each is theoretically expected to act upon both the inclusion and fairness dimensions of
diversity climate. We test these expectations using regression analysis of departmental-level data collected through
surveys of four North Carolina public organizations. The results suggest that workplace voice and teamwork enhance
diversity climate, while centralized decision-making diminishes it in workplaces with mostly white employees.
Practically speaking, the results imply that common management techniques that benefit public organizations also
foster positive diversity climates.
Evidence for Practice
Employee perceptions of the extent to which an organization is fair and inclusive, known as diversity climate,
have been linked to a range of important organizational outcomes.
Common managerial practices that produce organizational benefits also appear to strengthen diversity
climate, specifically workplace voice, decentralized decision-making, and teamwork.
Public managers wishing to improve diversity climate should consider giving employees meaningful voice in
workplace decisions, pushing decisions downward, and fostering teamwork.
Social injustices toward women and people
of color persist today. The tragic murder of
George Floyd, along with bias and hate crimes
against Asian and Asian-American communities, has
foregrounded issues of police brutality and racially
motivated violence that people of color have long
borne. Meanwhile, the unprecedented coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic further exposed
and amplified social inequities against historically
disadvantaged groups (Gaynor and Wilson2020).
Accelerated by the renewed calls for social justice,
the US government has committed itself to fostering
a more representative and diversified public
workforce in terms of race, ethnicity, and gender, to
dismantle systemic social injustices (Alexander and
Stivers2020).
While workforce diversity is a necessary step toward
greater representation and social justice, diversity
alone cannot achieve these values. Rather, public
organizations need to create a positive diversity
climate for their employees, defined as a shared
perception of a fair and inclusive workplace (Mor
Barak et al.1998; Sabharwal2014). Despite an
increased interest in diversity climate among
public administration scholars, much of the public
administration research has focused on individual
perceptions of diversity management and diversity
climate, with little attention to diversity climate as a
group phenomenon. This knowledge gap is worthy
of exploration since a shared favorable perception
of fairness and inclusion within organizations is
required for achieving social justice and diversity
management goals (Dwertmann, Nishii, and Van
Knippenberg2016).
A parallel line of research in the general management
field supports that group-level diversity climate
conveys important normative information to
employees about the extent to which an organization
values and rewards diversity (Cox1994; Kossek
and Zonia1993; Thomas1990). Such information
provides clear orientation and guidelines for
employees regarding what behaviors are expected and
what behaviors are prohibited by the organization
(Cox1994). Therefore, a positive diversity climate
can prevent identity-based mistreatment behaviors
in workplace, thereby reducing discrepancies among
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 82, Iss. 3, pp. 459–472. © 2022
The Authors. Public Administration
Review published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
on behalf of American Society for Public
Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13494.
Erin L. Borry is an associate professor in
the Department of Political Science and
Public Administration at the University
of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama.
Her research interests include rules and
red tape, organizational ethics, social
equity, and public administration in pop
culture. Her work has appeared in such
journals as
Public Administration Review
,
Public Management Review
,
International
Public Management Journal
, and
Public
Administration
.
Email: borry@uab.edu
Leisha DeHart-Davis is a Coates
Distinguished Term Professor of Public
Administration and Government at the
School of Government, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
She studies public sector organizational
behavior.
Email: ldehart@email.unc.edu
Zhongnan Jiang is an assistant professor
in the School of Public Economics and
Administration at Shanghai University
of Finance and Economics, Shanghai.
She earned her PhD in Public Policy
and Management from the Ohio State
University. Her research focuses on
organizational behavior, diversity, and
social equity in public organizations. Her
work has appeared in such journals as
Public Management Review
,
International
Public Management Journal
, and
Public
Administration
.
Email: jiangzhongnan@shufe.edu.cn
Research Article:
Race and Gender
Symposium
[The copyright line for this
article was changed on
6April 2022 after original
online publication.]

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT