Managerial Communication and Frontline Workers’ Willingness to Abide by Rules: Evidence From Local Security Agencies in China

AuthorFan Yang,Menghan Zhao,Youlang Zhang
DOI10.1177/0275074020983798
Published date01 May 2021
Date01 May 2021
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020983798
American Review of Public Administration
2021, Vol. 51(4) 293 –307
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0275074020983798
journals.sagepub.com/home/arp
Article
Introduction
Frontline workers’ rule abidance is important to maintain the
operation of public organizations; it also sustains the legiti-
macy of organizational authority and affects organizational
performance (Assadi & Lundin, 2018; Blau, 1963; DeHart-
Davis et al., 2013; Maynard-Moody & Musheno, 2003; Scott,
1997; Weber, 1946). Frontline workers in public organizations
are street-level bureaucrats who interact directly with citizens
and have considerable discretion in their jobs (Keulemans &
Groeneveld, 2020; Lipsky, 1980; Maroulis, 2017; Tummers
et al., 2015). Despite the widespread practical importance of
street-level bureaucrats abiding by frontline rules (e.g., poli-
cies, regulations, or norms), researchers have observed that
actual abidance varies greatly across public organizations
(DeHart-Davis, 2009b; Gofen, 2014; Maynard-Moody &
Musheno, 2003; Oberfield, 2010; Tummers et al., 2012). This
begs the question, “Why are frontline workers in some public
organizations more willing to abide by rules than those in
other public organizations?” Answering this question can pro-
vide scholars and practitioners with important insights into the
patterns of street-level bureaucratic decisions, the dynamics of
street-level management, and the potential determinants of
policy implementation or service delivery in the public sector
(Gassner & Gofen, 2018; Keulemans & Groeneveld, 2020).
Previous studies have explored the factors that facilitate
or hinder street-level bureaucrats’ rule abidance in the pub-
lic sector by examining the effects of rule attributes (DeHart-
Davis, 2009a, 2009b), bureaucrats’ situational perceptions
(Baviskar & Winter, 2017; Fleming, 2020; Raaphorst,
2018), and bureaucrats’ personal characteristics (DeHart-
Davis, 2007; Portillo & DeHart-Davis, 2009). However,
little attention has been paid to the role of managerial com-
munication (i.e., the formal or informal transmission of
information between managers and workers, such as face-
to-face meetings or email directives; Bell & Martin, 2014;
Simon, 1997) in shaping bureaucrats’ rule abidance, espe-
cially in frontline agencies that interact directly with citi-
zens. One potential reason for this omission in the extant
literature is that previous research tends to assume that
street-level workers have communicated with frontline
managers sufficiently before they make decisions regarding
frontline rules; another possible reason is that an empirical
983798ARPXXX10.1177/0275074020983798The American Review of Public AdministrationZhang et al.
research-article2021
1Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
2East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China
Corresponding Author:
Fan Yang, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai,
China.
Email: 1308924459@qq.com
Managerial Communication and
Frontline Workers’ Willingness to
Abide by Rules: Evidence From
Local Security Agencies in China
Youlang Zhang1, Fan Yang2, and Menghan Zhao1
Abstract
Previous research has studied both rule- and individual-level determinants of rule abidance of frontline workers, but
the effect of managerial communication has not been adequately explored. Based on extant literature on street-level
bureaucracy, managerial communication, and behavioral public administration, this study develops a novel framework to
theorize the relationship between managerial communication and frontline workers’ willingness to abide by frontline rules.
The framework highlights that managerial communication could improve frontline workers’ willingness to abide by rules by
directly monitoring their behaviors or indirectly increasing their perceived rule clarity and risk of punishment. Moreover,
as organizational size increases, the effect of managerial communication on frontline workers’ willingness to abide by rules
decreases. The study uses unique data from a 2018–2019 survey covering 94 frontline managers and 717 frontline workers
in local security agencies in mainland China to empirically test the hypotheses.
Keywords
managerial communication, rule abidance, street-level bureaucracy, local governance, China

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT