Making it happen: The pivotal role of knowledge sharing for information technology deployment success during joint venture change
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2198 |
Date | 01 May 2018 |
Author | Gareth R. T. White,Sally Eaves1,Vikas Kumar,John Loonam |
Published date | 01 May 2018 |
RESEARCH ARTICLE
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2198
Strategic Change. 2018;27(3):245–255. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jsc © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 245
Abstract
Tacit and explicit knowledge sharing must be connually culvated to enable informaon tech-
nology implementaon success. Eecve informaon technology deployment necessitates a
holisc focus beyond technical and legacy factors to include social, organizaonal, polical, and
interpersonal dimensions. Aenon to cultural integraon is a crical component of managing
joint venture change and building employee engagement, percepon of legimacy and knowl-
edge sharing norms. Individual employees occupy a key role in determining intended strategic
impacts by comming to and enacng change eorts, parcularly though making discreonary
decisions to share their knowledge or alternavely to hoard, hide or disengage from sharing; an
outcome which may be inuenced by percepons on knowledge ownership and value.
1
|
INTRODUCTION
In an environment of accelerang complexity (Hempel & Marnsons,
2009), organizaons are connually challenged by strategic renewal
(Ben‐Menahem, Kwee, Volberda, & Van Den Bosch, 2013) to ensure
ongoing ecacy and business survival and moreover, to idenfy their
next source of growth. Choices include growing organically, through
merger and acquision, or by the formaon of alliances such as joint
venture companies (Reinartz, Dellaert, Kra, Kumar, & Varadarajan,
2011). Collaborave intercorporate arrangements are increasingly
popular with 44,000 transacons totaling more than 2.9 trillion GBP
recorded in 2015 alone (Instute of Mergers, Acquisions and Alli-
ances, 2016). Despite this popularity, such strategic moves do not
come without risk and uncertainty. Many fail to actualize their poten-
al (Ariño & de la Torre, 1998) and lead to poor performance or even
early terminaon (Cui & Kumar, 2012) due to the inherent complexity
that organizaonal integraon involves (Beamish & Lupton, 2009).
Of all types of strategic alliance, joint ventures are second only to
merger in the level of integraon required (Todeva & Knoke, 2005).
Movaon to partner can span organizaonal, economic, technologi-
cal, strategic, and polical dimensions but the overarching intent of
such a move is broadly to enable the pares concerned to share risk
and create sustainable value (Doz & Hamel, 1999) through the syn-
ergies that emerge when complementary capabilies are combined
(Oxley & Sampson, 2004). Inter‐rm cooperave agreements also
provide opportunies for new knowledge access, exchange and orga-
nizaonal learning (Khamseh & Jolly, 2008). Within telecommunica-
ons, a technology‐based raonale is parcularly strong, for example
to run, enhance, and share network infrastructure (KPMG, 2009) but
the complexity of integraon required remains challenging (Åberg &
Sias, 2004), parcularly in relaon to legacy systems.
The case study provides an example of a related joint venture that
is typically orientated toward the sharing, opmizaon and integraon
of extant resources to leverage economies of scope and scale, rather
than aiming to learn vastly new capabilies or understand new mar-
kets (Cui & Kumar, 2012). To deliver an integral organizaon that can
achieve its intended strategic impacts requires radical change (Gersick,
1994) which is problemac to realize (Palmer & Dunford, 2002) and
can result in high rates of failure (Oreg, Vakola, & Armenakis, 2011).
Eecve mechanisms to manage and combine shared resources and
facilitate mullevel exchange (Inkpen, 2000; Kogut, 1988; Wei, Choy,
& Yew, 2009) become ever crical, parcularly the idencaon,
transfer, and internalizaon of tacit, collecve and embedded knowl-
edge (Todeva & Knoke, 2005).
Making it happen: The pivotal role of knowledge sharing for
informaon technology deployment success during joint
venture change*
Sally Eaves1 | Vikas Kumar2 | Gareth R. T. White3 | John Loonam4
1Aston Business School, Aston University,
Birmingham, United Kingdom
2Bristol Business School, University of the
West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
3Faculty of Business and Society, University
of South Wales, Pontypridd, Wales, United
Kingdom
4Dublin City University Business School,
Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
Correspondence
Sally Eaves, Aston Business School, Aston
University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
Email: sally@sallyeaves.com
* JEL classicaon codes: D83, L10, L24, M15, O33.
To continue reading
Request your trial