Madame Justice Will Save Our Democracy: Gender Bias and Perceptions of the High Court in Transitional Regimes
| Published date | 01 December 2023 |
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/10659129231169712 |
| Author | Christopher Shortell,Melody E. Valdini |
| Date | 01 December 2023 |
| Subject Matter | Articles |
Article
Political Research Quarterly
2023, Vol. 76(4) 1619–1631
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/10659129231169712
journals.sagepub.com/home/prq
Madame Justice Will Save Our Democracy:
Gender Bias and Perceptions of the High
Court in Transitional Regimes
Christopher Shortell
1
and Melody E. Valdini
1
Abstract
While existing literature has established that women leaders are stereotyped as more likely to uphold the norms of
democracy, the power of this effect in the non-democratic context is not established. We address this gap and argue that
the context of regime transition cultivates a unique dynamic in which the stereotypes associated with women justices
become especially valuable to both citizens and the state. However, we argue that this perception of women contributing
to the health of democracy is not constant across all citizens equally; instead, those people with high levels of hostile bias
against women are more likely to view women as the potential saviors of the democracy. To test our theories, we offer
original survey data from Thailand and Poland, two countries in the midst of regime transition. We find evidence that
suggests that the impact of women justices on assessments of democratic health is indeed dependent on hostile bias in
Thailand, but that the relationship is not found in Poland. Our results suggest that bias can sometimes operate in
unexpected ways, and that scholars should consider multiple measures of different types of bias when investigating its
effects on behavior.
Keywords
gender, courts, bias, judges, democracy
Introduction
The public perception of women in positions of authority
plays a critical role in how and when women are able to
occupy those positions. This has prompted a burgeoning
literature on the impression created by female legislators
and executives, demonstrating a connection between the
presence of women in these roles and improved popular
evaluations of the overall political system. Much less
attention has been paid to this dynamic in the context of
the judiciary. Initial evidence from stable democracies
shows a similar relationship between women’s presence
and positive evaluations of the regime but does not ad-
dress how this dynamic may change in non-democracies
or those countries in a period of regime transition. In this
article, we address this gap and argue that the context of
regime transition cultivates a unique dynamic in which
gender bias—and specifically, hostile bias—triggers un-
expected support for women in the highest court. That is,
we argue that the context of losing one’s democracy
causes certain citizens to react to women justices in
surprising ways due to their desire to maintain or return to
more democratic traits. While hostile bias is negatively
correlated with perceptions of legitimacy of women-
dominated courts in stable democracies, we argue that
the unique political context of a transitional regime causes
those citizens with hostile bias to see women as potentially
valuable. We test our theories using an original data set of
over 600 survey respondents in Poland and Thailand and
find evidence that women’s judicial presence in the
context of a transitioning regime sometimes triggers
citizens with hostile bias to see women as potential saviors
of the democracy, though not always. These findings
indicate that the presence of women on courts is sufficient
to generate improved evaluations of the democratic health
1
Department of Political Science, Portland State University, Portland,
OR, USA
Corresponding Author:
Christopher Shortell, Department of Political Science, Portland State
University, Hatfield School of Government, P.O. Box 751, Portland,
OR 97207-0751, USA.
Email: shortell@pdx.edu
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting