Long‐term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural network based on preprocessing technique
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/for.2564 |
Published date | 01 April 2019 |
Author | Zhi‐Yu Wang,Fang‐Fang Li,Jun Qiu |
Date | 01 April 2019 |
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Long‐term streamflow forecasting using artificial neural
network based on preprocessing technique
Fang‐Fang Li
1
| Zhi‐Yu Wang
2
| Jun Qiu
3
1
College of Water Resources and Civil
Engineering, China Agricultural
University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Shandong Water Conservancy
Vocational College, Rizhao 276826, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience
and Engineering, Tsinghua University,
Beijing 100084, China
Correspondence
Jun Qiu, State Key Laboratory of
Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua
University, Beijing 100084, China.
Email: aeroengine@tsinghua.edu.cn
Funding information
National Key R&D Program of China,
Grant/Award Number: 2017YFC0403600,
2017YFC0403602; Open Project of State
Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and
Agriculture, Qinghai University, Grant/
Award Number: 2016‐KF‐03
Abstract
Artificial neural network (ANN) combined with signal decomposing methods is
effective for long‐term streamflow time series forecasting. ANN is a kind of
machine learning method utilized widely for streamflow time series, and which
performs well in forecasting nonstationary time series without the need of phys-
ical analysis for complex and dynamic hydrological processes. Most studies take
multiple factors determining the streamflow as inputs such as rainfall. In this
study, a long‐term streamflow forecasting model depending only on the histori-
cal streamflow data is proposed. Various preprocessing techniques, including
empirical mode decomposition (EMD), ensemble empirical mode decomposi-
tion (EEMD) and discrete wavelet transform (DWT), are first used to decompose
the streamflow time series into simple components with different timescale
characteristics, and the relation between these components and the original
streamflow at the next time step is analyzed by ANN. Hybrid models EMD‐
ANN, EEMD‐ANN and DWT‐ANN are developed in this study for long‐term
daily streamflow forecasting, and performance measures root mean square error
(RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency
(NSE) indicate that the proposed EEMD‐ANN method performs better than
EMD‐ANN and DWT‐ANN models, especially in high flow forecasting.
KEYWORDS
artificial neural network (ANN), discrete wavelet translate (DWT),empirical mode decomposition
(EMD), ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), hybridmodel, long‐term streamflow
forecasting
1|INTRODUCTION
Long‐term streamflow forecasting plays an important role
in water resources management and utilization (Yang,
Tian, Sun, Yuan, & Hu, 2014; Yaseen et al., 2016), such
as the assessment of water consumption, water supply,
drought and flood disasters, and the scheduling of water
resources.
A number of research studies have been reported on
hydrological forecasting in past decades, mainly including
physical models and mathematical methods (X. L. Zhang,
Peng, Zhang, & Wang, 2015). Physical models explore the
hydrological dynamic process of watershed combing
weather processes (Chen & Brissette, 2015; Smiatek,
Kunstmann, & Werhahn, 2012; Ye et al., 2017),
meteorological conditions (Hanna et al., 2013; Ralph,
Coleman, Neiman, Zamora, & Dettinger, 2013) and under-
lying surface conditions (Rosenberg, Clark, Steinemann, &
Lettenmaier, 2013; Sinha, Sankarasubramanian, &
Mazrooei, 2014). However, due to the complexity of the
hydrological processes affected by various factors such as
runoff, rainfall and human activity, not only a large
Received: 2 June 2018 Revised: 26 September 2018 Accepted: 21 November 2018
DOI: 10.1002/for.2564
192 © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Journal of Forecasting. 2019;38:192–206.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/for
To continue reading
Request your trial