Letter from the Editor
Author | Luke Bunting |
Position | Editor-in-Chief |
Pages | 1-2 |
LetterfromtheEditor
DearReader,
TheGeorgetownJournalofLaw&PublicPolicyisproudtopresentthefirst
issueofVolumeTwenty.Thisissuecontainsbothaselectionofarticlesonmany
topicsdominatingthenationaldiscourseandaseriesofarticlespresentedatthe
GeorgetownCenterfortheConstitution’sSeventhAnnualSalmonP.Chase
DistinguishedLecture&FacultyColloquium.
TheSalmonP.ChaseLectureseriesispublishedinpartnershipwiththe
GeorgetownCenterfortheConstitution.TheCenteranditsDirector,Randy
Barnett,remainclosefriendsofourjournal.The2020lectureandcolloquium,
publishedhere,commemoratethe100thanniversaryoftheadoptionofthe
NineteenthAmendment,whichfinallyextendedtherighttovotetowomen.The
colloquiumarticlesincludedinthisvolumediscussboththehistoricallandscape
surroundingtheAmendment’sadoptionandhowAmericanscanensureitspoten-
tialisfullyrealized.
TheissuebeginswithanintroductorylecturebyProfessorMarthaS.Jones,
followedbyarticlesfromProfessorsRevaB.Siegel,EllenD.Katz,PaulaA.
Monopoli,andDavidE.Bernstein.Eachpieceexaminesthefightforwomen’s
suffragethroughauniquelens,whetheritbetheconceptof“constitutionalmem-
ory”orthejuxtapositionofimportantjudicialprecedents.Giventherecentfocus
onvotinglawsandpractices,thesymposiumarticlesprovideawelcomeover-
viewofthehistoryofthefranchiseinAmericaandanalysisofoneofthe
Constitution’smostprominentguaranteesofit.
Inaddition,thisissuefeaturesscholarshipfromadistinguishedgroupof
authorsonanarrayoftimelytopics.JoshBlackmanandSethBarrettTillman
examinethethresholdissuesatplayintheEmolumentsClauselitigationbrought
againstPresidentDonaldTrump,providingaframeworkforcategorizingactions
bypresidentsandanalyzingwhenandhowsuchsuitscanbebrought.The
HonorableTimothyTymkovichoftheU.S.CourtofAppealsfortheTenth
CircuitandHayleyStillwellputforthatheoryofmaliciousprosecutionbasednot
intheFourthAmendment,butratherintheFourteenthAmendment’sprotection
ofdueprocess.EricR.ClaeysidentifiestheholdingsanddictaofbothRoev.
WadeandPlannedParenthoodofSoutheasternPennsylvaniav.Caseyin
responsetoChiefJusticeRoberts’scharacterizationofeachduringoralargu-
mentsinDobbsv.JacksonWomen’sHealthOrganization.SherifGirgisargues
againstrecentsuggestionsthattheSupremeCourtupholdtheMississippistatute
atissueinDobbsunderCasey’sundue-burdentest,findingsuchsuggestionstobe
basedonenduringmisreadingsofCasey,andthatsuchanoutcomewouldrun
countertothecase’sactuallogic.PaulLarkin,Jr.,offerstwopiecesrelatedtothe
federalgovernment’sresponsetoCOVID-19.Thefirstconsidersthepolitical,
practical,andconstitutionalquestionsatplaywhenthefederalgovernment
decidesbetweenpersuadingandcoercingAmericansintoreceivingavaccine.
i
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
