Letter from the Coeditors

Date01 April 2022
DOI10.1177/00905917211069594
Published date01 April 2022
AuthorNancy Luxon,Elisabeth Ellis,Joshua Foa Dienstag,Davide Panagia
Subject MatterEditorial
https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917211069594
Political Theory
2022, Vol. 50(2) 191 –192
© The Author(s) 2022
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00905917211069594
journals.sagepub.com/home/ptx
Editorial
Letter from the
Coeditors
Issue 50.2, April 2022
As this issue of Political Theory goes to press, we are approaching the two-
year anniversary of the COVID-19 pandemic. It lightened the hearts of the
editors and the members of the Executive Editorial Committee to read the
fantastic proposals that members of our community made in response to our
call for contributions to the journal’s fiftieth anniversary issue. In the midst of
circumstances that made our work and home lives difficult, members of our
disciplinary community were still able to propose fabulous works of imagi-
native theorizing.
The dangerous times we are all experiencing have also affected our quo-
tidian work as political theorists. Many of us are having trouble finding time
to do original research, not to mention ordinary professional services such as
refereeing our colleagues’ manuscripts. These days it is not uncommon for us
at Political Theory to make ten referee requests before securing two commit-
ments to review, and we hear from our fellow editors that other journals are
experiencing similar difficulties. The word many of us reach for to describe
our now limited capacities for this kind of work is “stretched.”
We use the word “community” in this letter’s first paragraph advisedly.
While the journal and the discipline it serves have grown over the past half
century, becoming more (if insufficiently) diverse and in many ways more
professional, political theorists themselves have cultivated a vocational ethos
and a community of practice that support our scholarly endeavors. Political
theorists are especially well placed to understand that as our discipline moves
from a small collection of people who know each other well to a larger, more
anonymous, more diverse subfield, we cannot rely exclusively on formal sys-
tems of incentives to motivate the public-goods provision that grounds our
collective endeavor.
The pandemic (of course!) has provided an illuminating natural experi-
ment for the conditions of provision of disciplinary service: while the formal
incentives have not changed, our informal networks of social and profes-
sional relationships have grown thin without the face-to-face interactions that
1069594PTXXXX10.1177/00905917211069594Political Theory
letter2021

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT