Legal Enemy No. 1, 020119 COBJ, Vol. 49, No. 2 Pg. 26
Author | BY SARAH MYERS. |
Position | Vol. 49, 2 [Page 26] |
WELLNESS
BY SARAH MYERS.
If you lose the power to laugh, you lose the power to think.
—Clarence Darrow
The term "public enemy" has been used for centuries to refer to outlaws, and it saw expanded use in the 1930s when particularly notorious criminals were designated "public enemy no. 1." The phrase has evolved to include dangers to public health and safety in general. Like the term "patient zero," the concept is simple: find the source of something that negatively impacts a large group of people, and you can find a solution to the problem. There's a large body of research on maladies related to and impacting lawyers. But what's "legal enemy no. 1?" It's too much seriousness. Seriously.
The Seriousness Trap
It
turns out Mr. Darrow was correct: when we overthink,
ruminate, and perseverate on problems, irritants, or
resentments, we lose connectivity to the parts of the brain
where humor, executive functioning, solutions, creativity,
logic, pragmatism, and compassion dwell. Screenwriter,
novelist, and filmmaker Anthony McCarten points out that
"seriousness is dangerous, not just for ourselves, but
also in society. . . . [T]he forces of seriousness, of
humorlessness, would limit us to narrow thinking, rigid
ideology, cruelty, and a tunnel vision, whereas humor obliges
us to have an open mind. It obliges empathy and
forgiveness."
Neuroscience
and cognitive research are clear on this subject. We
can't stress ourselves smart; we can only "stress
ourselves stupid."
You
might have heard of Dan Harris's book 10%
Happier.
To continue reading
Request your trial