Lee, Richard Henry (1732–1794)

Author:Dennis J. Mahoney
Pages:1575

Page 1575

Educated in England, Richard Henry Lee practiced law in his native Virginia and became a justice of the peace in 1757. The next year he was elected to the House of Burgesses where his first speech was in favor of a measure to check the spread of SLAVERY. Lee was a leader of opposition to parliamentary taxation of the colonies and wrote the protest of the House of Burgesses against the Sugar Act (1764). When the royal governor dissolved the House of Burgesses in 1774, Lee introduced a resolution, adopted by the rump of the house, calling for a continental congress. As a delegate to the FIRST CONTINENTAL CONGRESS

Lee proposed formation of committees of correspondence (a plan he originated with PATRICK HENRY and THOMAS JEFFERSON) and adoption of the continental ASSOCIATION. In June 1776 Lee made the original motions in the Continental Congress for a DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, confederation, and seeking of foreign alliances. He later advocated Virginia's cession of western territorial claims in order to facilitate ratification of the ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION; and, in 1784, he was elected President of the United States in Congress Assembled.

Lee was chosen as a delegate to the CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1787 but declined appointment, citing conflict with his responsibilities as a member of Congress. When the new Constitution was submitted to Congress, Lee opposed it on the ground that the convention had exceeded its mandate. Seeing that he could not block the proposal, he attempted, but failed, to have Congress add a BILL OF RIGHTS (drafted by GEORGE MASON).

Lee was a leading opponent of RATIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION. His seventeen "Letters from the Federal Farmer," widely printed in newspapers, were among the most influential of the various ANTIFEDERALIST writings. In the letters Lee presented a wide-ranging critique of the new Constitution: it was consolidationist, not federal, and would rob the states of their SOVEREIGNTY; it was aristocratic, or even monarchical, in tendency, not...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP