Leader gender, country culture, and the management of COVID‐19

Published date01 December 2022
AuthorValentina Dimitrova‐Grajzl,Janelle Gornick,Iyabo Obasanjo
Date01 December 2022
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.547
Received: 13 December 2021
|
Revised: 20 May 2022
|
Accepted: 2 August 2022
DOI: 10.1002/wmh3.547
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Leader gender, country culture, and the
management of COVID19
Valentina DimitrovaGrajzl
1
|Janelle Gornick
2
|
Iyabo Obasanjo
3
1
Department of Economics and Business,
Virginia Military Institute, Lexington,
Virginia, USA
2
Department of Psychology, Virginia Military
Institute, Lexington, Virginia, USA
3
Department of Kinesiology & Health
Sciences, College of William and Mary,
Williamsburg, Virginia, USA
Correspondence
Valentina DimitrovaGrajzl, Department of
Economics and Business, Virginia Military
Institute, Lexington, VA 24450, USA.
Email: dimitrova-grajzlvp@vmi.edu
Abstract
As early as two months into the COVID19 pandemic,
popular media started reporting that women leaders,
compared to men leaders, were managing COVID19
better. This paper empirically examines the impact of
women leaders in managing pandemic health outcomes
one year after the onset of the pandemic. Further, we
consider leader effectiveness within the context of
country culture. We nd that women's leadership is
indeed associated with better containment of the
pandemic. We also nd that certain countrylevel cultural
traits play a signicant role in pandemic outcomes. More
hierarchical societies experience higher COVID19
cases and death. Individualistic cultures and masculine
cultures are associated with more deaths from the
pandemic. Some cultural traits modulate women's ability
to manage COVID19. Our ndings have implications for
health policy and provide rationale for promoting gender
equity in political leadership.
KEYWORDS
COVID19, culture, women leaders
Key points
Women's leadership is associated with better contain-
ment of the COVID19 pandemic.
Certain cultural traits have an impact on pandemic
outcomes. Hierarchical societies have higher rates of
COVID19 cases and deaths. Individualistic cultures
and masculine cultures are associated with more
COVID19 deaths but not cases.
World Med. & Health Policy. 2022;14:773797. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/wmh3
|
773
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercialNoDerivs License, which
permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial and no
modications or adaptations are made.
© 2022 The Authors. World Medical & Health Policy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Policy Studies Organization.
The effect of women leaders on COVID19 rates and
deaths is modulated by cultural traits. More speci-
cally, shortterm orientation and indulgent cultures
seem to boost women's effectiveness in tackling the
pandemic.
The mechanism of how culture inuences the effec-
tiveness of women leaders needs to be studied
further.
INTRODUCTION
As early as late spring 2020, popular media reported better management of the COVID19
pandemic in countries led by women as opposed to countries led by men. Headlines such as
What Do Countries with the Best Coronavirus Responses Have in Common? Women
Leadersfrom Forbes (WittenbergCox, 2020), and Why are WomenLed Nations Doing
Better with Covid19from the New York Times (Taub, 2020) had the general population and
researchers deliberating the validity of such claims.
Researchers have taken up the challenge of empirically investigating the reported
association between women leaders and COVID19 health outcomes. Withincountry
analysis by Sergent and Stajkovic (2020) found that, as of May 2020, US states with women
governors had fewer COVID19 deaths per capita than those governed by men. On an
international level, researchers have found that countries with women leaders showed
reduced COVID19related deaths per capita and that women were more effective in
introducing the mitigating policy, such as countrylevel shutdowns, mask mandates, and
contact tracing against COVID19 (Abras et al., 2021; Coscieme et al., 2020; Garikipati &
Kambhampati, 2021; Park, 2021).
However, the overall country culture also seems to affect COVID19 rates (Ibanez &
Sisodia, 2020; Mayer et al., 2020). Furthermore, researchers such as Windsor et al. (2020)
have concluded women are able to attain national leadership positions in countries where
core cultural values reward traits often found in women leaders, such as a longterm
orientation, a collectivist (rather than individualist) focus, and fewer power disparities in
society(p. 2). Thus, it is important to consider and separate out country culture when
examining the specic, unique impact of women's leadership on pandemic outcomes. Very
few studies have evaluated the impact of both leader gender and countrylevel cultural
variables on pandemic outcomes. So far, to our knowledge, Windsor et al. (2020) and
Garikipati and Kambhampati (2021) are the only researchers to include both leader gender
and some measure of culture or social norms when assessing COVID19 outcomes. The
results of each highlight the need to investigate this relationship further. Windsor et al.
(2020) found that including cultural level variables in their model reduced the association
between women's leadership and lower COVID19 death rate to a nonstatistically
signicant trend. From this, they concluded that countrylevel cultural values were
confounding the effect of womenled countries having better COVID19 outcomes. However,
Garikipati and Kambhampati (2021) found support for the popular media claims while
accounting for a proxy for genderrelated cultural differences. They used nearestneighbor
matching to control for countrylevel differences on the Gender Inequality Index, a proxy for
gender inequality in the context of health, educational attainment, political participation, and
labor market participation. Results showed that womenled countries had lower death rates
from COVID19.
This paper contributes to the literature examining leaderseffectiveness, throug h
the lens of gender, in health policy and on communitylevel health outcomes
774
|
DIMITROVAGRAJZL ET AL.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex