Landscape of Distrust: Political Trust Across America’s Urban-Rural Divide

Published date01 January 2025
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X241273220
AuthorJames R. G. Kirk
Date01 January 2025
Article
American Politics Research
2025, Vol. 53(1) 2835
© The Author(s) 2024
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X241273220
journals.sagepub.com/home/apr
Landscape of Distrust: Political Trust Across
Americas Urban-Rural Divide
James R. G. Kirk
1
Abstract
Do rural Americans trust the government less than non-rural Americans? In an era of declining trust in government and mounting
geographic polarization, this research examines the relationship between geography, identity, and attitudes of political trust in the
United States. Using national survey data from the 2016 and 2020 American National Election Studies time series surveys, this
quantitative analysis tests hypotheses that rurality in the context of place and place-based identity is associated with lower trust in the
federal government. Overall, the results show that both living in and identifying with more rural areas corresponds with decreased
government trust, regardless of the political party of the incumbent president. These ndings contribute to the understanding of
Americas urban-rural political divide and suggest signicant implications for both partisan leaders and policymakers.
Keywords
rural politics, trust, urban-rural divide
From public health skepticism to the embrace of the anti-
establishment politics of Donald Trump, signs of political
distrust appear to persist across rural America. Amidst the
COVID-19 pandemic, CDC data has shown that vaccination
rates in rural counties severely lagged those in urban counties
(Saelee et al., 2022), conrming early reports of rural re-
sistance to federal government health programs and infor-
mation during the pandemic (Ivory et al., 2021;Jackson &
Chablani, 2021). Beyond COVID-19, the modern era of
American partisanship has proven rural America to be a
stronghold of Donald Trump and Trump-backed candidates,
who often center anti-establishment distrust in their politics
(Gamio, 2016;Kurtzleben, 2016).
Motivated by these geographically divergent social and
political outcomes, I seek to question if in fact political trust
varies across Americas urban-rural continuum. Do Ameri-
cans living in, or identifying with, a more rural area trust the
government less? Answering this question is critical to un-
derstanding the contours of conservative political shifts in
rural America. Examining political trust across the urban-
rural divide also deepens our understanding of rural political
consciousness (Cramer, 2016;Jacobs & Munis, 2023;Lunz
Trujillo & Crowley, 2022) by providing important details
regarding the relationship between rural identity and gov-
ernment. This article examines the issue of rural political
distrust specically, and uses national survey data to provide
new evidence of lower government trust among rural
Americans. In doing so, this study answers the critical
question of if political distrust is indeed another fault line
between urban and rural individuals.
Building upon research on political trust and the study of
Americas urban-rural divide, (Cramer, 2012;2016;Lunz
Trujillo, 2022;McKay et al., 2021), this paper considers the
relationship between place, place-based identity, and po-
litical trust in American politics. Specically, I hypothesize
that both living in a more rural area and identifying with a
more rural area will be associated with lower levels of
government trust. Using national survey data across mul-
tiple recent elections, varying incumbency contexts, and a
series of measures of rurality, this paper examines the as-
sociation between the places that Americans inhabit, the
places that they identify with, and their political trust. The
results of this analysis provide evidence that in both recent
Democratic and Republican administrations, living in and
identifying with a more rural area corresponds to lower
levels of political trust.
1
Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame,
IN, USA
Corresponding Author:
James R. G. Kirk, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame,
2060 Jenkins Nanovic Halls, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Email: jkirk6@nd.edu

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT