Labor market segmentation and occupational mobility in Algeria: Repeated cross‐sectional and longitudinal analyses (2007 to 2012)

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12519
AuthorYoughourta Bellache,Philippe Adair
Date01 November 2018
Published date01 November 2018
REGULAR ARTICLE
Labor market segmentation and occupational
mobility in Algeria: Repeated cross-sectional and
longitudinal analyses (2007 to 2012)
Philippe Adair
1
|
Youghourta Bellache
2
1
University Paris-Est Cr
eteil, Cr
eteil,
France
2
University Abderrahmane Mira, Bejaia,
Algeria
Correspondence
Philippe Adair, Faculty of Economics and
Management, ERUDITE, University
Paris-Est Cr
eteil, 61 avenue du G
en
eral
de Gaulle, Cr
eteil, 94000, France.
Email: adair@u-pec.fr
Abstract
The paper identifies the determinants and the patterns of
occupational mobility across the formal/informal employ-
ment divide as well as within the informal sector. Cross-
sectional analyses are applied to two samples (1,252 and
2,026 individuals) from two representative household sur-
veys conducted in 2007 and 2012 in Bejaia, an east-cen-
tral region of Algeria. In the first place, using a Mincer
earnings function shows there is a substantial wage gap
regarding the formal/informal wage employment divide.
However, human capital theory applies to formal employ-
ees rather than to informal ones. Hence, labor market seg-
mentation is not reducible to earnings functions. In the
second place, a multinomial logit model captures the
determinants of occupational mobility, which depend on
the characteristics of individuals: age, gender, marital sta-
tus, and human capital. Finally, the paper explores from a
longitudinal perspective a cohort of 445 individuals both
surveyed in 2007 and 2012. The aforementioned determi-
nants explain the patterns of occupational mobility of
active individuals who experience a change that improves
or deteriorates their job position, while shifting in both
directions across the formal and the informal sector and
within the informal sector.
DOI: 10.1111/rode.12519
Rev Dev Econ. 2018;22:17651783. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/rode ©2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
|
1765
1
|
INTRODUCTION
The growth of informal employment during the 2000s is a structural component of the labor mar-
ket in developing countries (Jutting & Laiglesia, 2009). For most countries of the Middle East and
North Africa (MENA) region, including Algeria, such growth occurs in the context of weak private
sector job creation (Elbadawi & Loayza, 2008). It results from both a large increase in the working
age population and the rising participation of women in the labor market.
Informal employment in Algeria has been rising significantly (Charmes, 2009; Charmes &
Remaoun, 2014) since the process of economic liberalization in the 1990s, and has fueled the for-
mal/informal segmentation of the labor market.
Following the definition from the International Labour Organization (ILO, 2013), the informal
sector includes self-employed workers, whereas informal employment adds employees within the
formal sector. A formal self-employed is registered with the Non-Salaried Social Insurance Fund
(CASNOS) and pays taxes, whereas an informal self-employed is not registered and does not pay
taxes. A formal employee is registered with the National Social Insurance Fund (CNAS), whereas
an informal employee is an unprotected worker who is not registered.
A few studies focus on the quantitative assessment of informal employment in Algeria (see
Adair & Bellache, 2008). However, they fail to capture the factors explaining the access to the
informal sector and the determinants of earnings that drive the behavior of individuals (Bellache,
Adair, & Bouznit, 2014) as well as public employment policies (Adair & Bellache, 2009; Souag,
Adair, & Hammouda, 2018).
So far, no national surveys have addressed the issue of informal employment in Algeria. The
annual labor force survey of the National Statistics Office (ONS) provides aggregated data con-
cerning informal employment, but the individual characteristics of informal workers prove unavail-
able. Hence, we designed two representative surveys in the region of Bejaia in Algeria: 2007 (522
households) and 2012 (1,016 households). Thanks to a multinomial logistic model, we highl ight
the determinants of access to the labor market for two samples of 1,252 and 2,026 individuals
from the two mentioned surveys. To our best knowledge, this is the first repeated cross-sectional
analysis in Algeria. In addition, it also includes a subsample of 445 individuals who were surveyed
twice in 2007 and 2012. This enables an exploratory cohort analysis that sheds some light upon
mobility patterns within and between labor market segments. This is the very first longitudinal sur-
vey ever made in Algeria. It is worth mentioning that employment surveys in Ukraine (Nezhy-
venko & Adair, 2017; Pag
es & Stampini, 2007) and Russia (Najman & Pailh
e, 2001) use rotative
samples, instead of cohorts addressing the same individuals.
We address three issues. First, the main reason why (Algerian) active people wish to change
their job positions is to improve their income; being a formal employee is mostly preferred, owing
to the advantages of an official job position vs an informal one. Hence, we use cross-section analy-
sis to examine wage differentials regarding employees in the first survey (2007). Seco nd, what are
the options of these people in terms of mobility, with respect to their characteristics? We model
the labor market status of the various categories of active people, using cross-section analysis upon
each survey (2007 and 2012). Third, we use the longitudinal data to address the issue of mobility
patterns in both upward and downward directions: who are the mobile/nonmobile active people
and how many are they?
Section 2 outlines the theoretical framework of workforce mobility within major models in
developing countries. Section 3 examines the trends and main characteristics of nonagricultural
informal employment in Algeria according to aggregated data from annual national surveys. Sec-
tion 4 presents the sampling and descriptive statistics of both representative surveys. Section 5 is
1766
|
ADAIR AND BELLACHE

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT