Kavanaugh Confirmed To Supreme Court After Close Vote.

PositionPEOPLE & EVENTS

Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's choice to replace Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, won confirmation in a close vote Oct. 6.

Kavanaugh's nomination process was delayed after Christine Blasey Ford, a California university professor, alleged that he had sexually assaulted her at a summer party in 1982, when she was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17 and both were living in Maryland.

The Senate held an additional hearing to question both Ford and Kavanaugh and asked the FBI to look into the matter. But the FBI was given less than a week to perform the investigation, which was widely condemned as perfunctory.

The Senate voted 50-48 to confirm Kavanaugh. Americans United opposed his nomination from the outset because of his extreme views on separation of church and state. For instance, he lauded the views of the late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, who once called the metaphor of the wall of separation between church and state "useless" and said it should be "frankly and explicitly abandoned." In a 2017 speech, Kavanaugh praised Rehnquist for his church-state views and saluted him for advocating for a new understanding of how religion and government should interact.

Research by Americans United indicates that Kavanaugh will likely support taxpayer aid to religious institutions, seek to introduce more coercive forms of religion in public schools and allow discrimination against women and members of the LGBTQ community on religious grounds.

Following the Senate vote, Rachel Laser, Americans United's president and CEO, issued the following statement:

"Brett Kavanaugh has shown himself to be unworthy of a seat on the Supreme Court, and today's vote in the Senate is a stain on that institution. Rather than a full and fair hearing that would have examined Kavanaugh's record and the serious charges against him, the country saw a rushed, perfunctory process that had all the hallmarks of a sham.

"Kavanaugh's views alone disqualified him from the Supreme Court, particularly his opposition to the separation of religion and government. His record as a judge of allowing people to use 'religious freedom' to discriminate is especially ominous in light of the Religious Right's movement, empowered and emboldened by this administration, to misuse this core American principle to...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP