KALLENBACH, JOSEPH E. Federal Coöp eration with the States under the Com merce Clause. Pp. viii, 428. Ann Ar bor: University of Michigan Press, 1942. $4.00

Published date01 November 1942
Date01 November 1942
DOI10.1177/000271624222400157
Subject MatterArticles
217
Supreme
Court
in
regard
to
regulatory
leg-
islation
in
the
coal
industry,
the
author
observes
that,
in
the
four
years
separating
the
Carter
case
from
the
Sunshine
Anthra-
cite
case,
the
Court
has,
with
&dquo;new
or
modi-
fied
views
on
matters
relating
to
Federal
control
of
the
economic
activities
under
the
commerce
power,&dquo;
made
it
possible
for
the
Bituminous
Coal
Division
&dquo;to
proceed
with
the
administration
of
the
Bituminous
Coal
Act
of
1937
with
the
knowledge
that
it
was
administering
a
valid
law.&dquo;
The
study
is
concluded
with
the
observa-
tion
that
&dquo;if
the
act
has
not
met
with
the
success
that
its
sponsors
originally
hoped,
only
part
of the
fault
may
be
placed
upon
the
doorstep
of
the
administrators.
It
is
true
that
errors
in
judgment
were
made
by
the
Commission
and
that
both
the
Commis-
sion
and
the
Division
spent
months
in
re-
establishing
the
prices
in
a
manner
which
would
meet
the
procedural
requirements
of
due
process.
The
difficulty
is
inherent
in
regulating
any
industry
as
complex
and
far-
flung
as
that
of
the
bituminous
coal
indus-
try.&dquo;
Furthermore,
Dr.
Baker
states
that
&dquo;the
administrative
difficulties
should
not
be used
as
an
argument
against
the
com-
mission
method
of
regulation.&dquo;
There
are
some
excellent
charts
relating
to
the
organization
of
the
Coal
Commis-
sion
and
the
Coal
Division.
The
appendix,
also,
contains
concise
professional
informa-
tion
about
individuals
who
have
held
posi-
tions
in
National
Bituminous
Coal
Commis-
sion,
the
Coal
Division,
and
Consumers’
Counsel.
MARY
EFFIE
CAMERON
Elmira
College
LEISERSON,
AVERY.
Administrative
Regu-
lation :
A
Study
in
the
Representation
of
Interests.
Pp.
xiii,
292.
Chicago :
Uni-
versity
of
Chicago
Press,
1942.
$3.00.
The
subtitle
of
this
book
describes
it
better
than
the
title.
The
author,
after
a
chapter
on
group
interests
as
sources
of
public
policy,
discusses
the
representation
of
interests
in
administrative
procedure,
on
boards,
and
on
advisory
committees.
There
are
two
chapters
on
the
administrative
functions
of
interest
groups,
a
chapter
on
legal
aspects,
and
a
concluding
chapter
on
the
political
theory
involved.
The
book
grew
out
of
a
year’s
field
in-
vestigation
in
1937-38
under
a
grant
by
the
Social
Science
Research
Council.
Most
of
the
materials
cited,
and
upon
which
the
author
relies
for
his
conclusions,
are
dated
in
the
middle
thirties.
Most
of
them,
moreover,
are
Federal;
and
this
fact
some-
times
leads
Dr.
Leiserson
to
make
broad
statements
which
are
true
of
the
national
but
not
of
state
or
local
governments;
for
example,
&dquo;Legislation,
whether
because
of
the
doctrine
of
separation
of
powers
or
other
reasons
of
policy,
rarely
limits
too
rigidly
the
appointing
executive’s
discre-
tion&dquo;
(p.
101).
This
book
is
a
good
summary
of the
problems
and
practices
of
group
representa-
tion.
Very
little
attention,
however,
is
given
to
the
effect
of
party
politics
on
the
selection
by
the executive
of
the
group
representatives
in
the
administrative
proc-
esses,
and
still
less
attention
to
the
politics
within
groups
that
either
makes
men
avail-
able
for
appointment
or
results
in
their
election
by
the
group,
whichever
is
the
legal
requirement.
How
interests
choose
their
representatives,
or
have
them
chosen,
is
an
important
part
of
the
story.
DAYTON
D.
McKEAN
Dartmouth
College
KALLENBACH,
JOSEPH
E.
Federal
Coöp-
eration
with
the
States
under
the
Com-
merce
Clause.
Pp.
viii,
428.
Ann
Ar-
bor:
University
of
Michigan
Press,
1942.
$4.00.
Dr.
Kallenbach,
in
his
carefully
though
not
trenchantly
written
volume,
has
given
us
an
exhaustive
study
of the
constitutional
interworkings
of
Federal
and
state
power
over
commerce.
He
discusses
regulation
of
commerce
by
divestment
of
Federal
power
through
congressional
act,
going
carefully
through
the
judicial
mazes
(and
more
rap-
idly
through
the
legislative
history)
of
the
Wilson
Act.
The
latter,
which
is
generally
spoken
of
as
removing
the
protection
of
interstate
commerce
from
the
sale
of
in-
toxicating
liquor,
was,
Kallenbach
points
out,
really
a
definition
of
the
point
at
which
intoxicating
liquors
became
subject
to
state
jurisdiction.
A
similar
formula
has
been
applied
to
game,
oleomargarine,
and
more
recently
to
prison-made
goods.
Judicial
re-
at SAGE PUBLICATIONS on December 5, 2012ann.sagepub.comDownloaded from

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT