Juvenile Psychopathy and Community Treatment Response in Youth Adjudicated for Sexual Offenses

AuthorErika Y. Rojas,Mark E. Olver
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X21994066
Published date01 November 2022
Date01 November 2022
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X21994066
International Journal of
Offender Therapy and
Comparative Criminology
2022, Vol. 66(15) 1575 –1602
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X21994066
journals.sagepub.com/home/ijo
Article
Juvenile Psychopathy and
Community Treatment
Response in Youth
Adjudicated for Sexual
Offenses
Erika Y. Rojas1 and Mark E. Olver2
Abstract
The present study examined the association of juvenile psychopathy features and
treatment response in a sample of 102 youth, court adjudicated for sexual offenses
and followed up more than 11 years in the community. The Psychopathy Checklist:
Youth Version (PCL: YV) was rated from comprehensive archival sources, along with
a youth sexual offense risk assessment and treatment planning measure scored pre-
and posttreatment. The PCL: YV converged with domains of sexual offense risk and
change in conceptually meaningful ways, and significantly predicted nonsexual violent,
general violent, and any recidivism; it did not significantly predict sexual recidivism.
Higher levels of psychopathy-related personality features were significantly associated
with noncompletion of youth sexual offense-specific treatment, while changes in risk
were associated with decreased recidivism controlling for PCL: YV score and baseline
risk at p < .10. The findings underscore the importance of intervention and support
services for youth convicted of sexual offenses as well as the clinical and risk relevance
of the juvenile psychopathy construct to decrease violent victimization to others.
Keywords
Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version, juvenile psychopathy, sexual offending,
treatment, recidivism
1Private Practice, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
2University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
Corresponding Author:
Mark E. Olver, Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, Arts 154,
Saskatoon, SK S7N5A5, Canada.
Email: mark.olver@usask.ca
994066IJOXXX10.1177/0306624X21994066International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative CriminologyRojas and Olver
research-article2021
1576 International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 66(15)
The problem of sexual violence is a pressing social concern with substantial health, jus-
tice, and community safety implications. The most recent Canadian statistics available
demonstrate that youth are overrepresented in the commission of sex crimes; in 2014,
they accounted for 17% of persons accused of sex crimes and 26% of sex crimes against
persons under age 18, most of which (>80%) were for contact offenses (Allen & Superle,
2016). In 41% of instances, the victim was a child under the age of 12 and most victims
were a friend/acquaintance (64%) or family member (31%). The consequences of sexual
violence are profound, with the results of meta-analyses documenting significant injuri-
ous psychological (Amado et al., 2015) and physical (Irish et al., 2010) health effects.
Juvenile psychopathy refers to a problematic pattern of interpersonal (e.g., impres-
sion management, egocentricity, lying, manipulation), affective (e.g., callousness, lack
of prosocial emotions, inadequate guilt), and behavioral (e.g., risk taking, impulsivity,
serious rule violations, poor anger controls) features. The traits are extreme, atypical,
and maladaptive variants of the personality, emotional, and behavioral attributes char-
acteristic of the developmental period of adolescence (Forth et al., 2003). Perhaps
unsurprisingly, youth with elevated features of psychopathy are overrepresented in the
youth justice system (Forth et al., 2003) and are more likely than youth with relatively
few features to commit varied harms against family members, peers, or other members
of the public, including sexual offenses (Caldwell et al., 2008).
The present study examines the forensic and therapeutic role and relevance of the
juvenile psychopathy construct among youth with formal criminal histories of sexual
offending. The following review situates the juvenile psychopathy construct, particu-
larly as measured by the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL: YV; Forth et al.,
2003)—a prominent symptom-construct rating scale of juvenile psychopathy designed
to assess the interpersonal, affective, and behavioral features of psychopathy in male
and female adolescents between ages 12 and 18—within the youth sexual offending,
assessment, and intervention literatures.
The Role and Relevance of Juvenile Psychopathy in
Youth Sexual Offending
Juvenile psychopathy is a construct with forensic and clinical relevance, and it comes
with a host of correlates that equate to harmful impacts including sexual as well as
other forms of interpersonal violence (Edens et al., 2007; Gretton et al., 2001; Olver
et al., 2009). In his review, DeLisi (2009) presents a compelling case for psychopathy
as an explanatory theory for criminal behavior, given that the syndrome accounts for a
disproportionate amount of varied, often instrumental, antisocial behavior across the
lifespan. Juvenile psychopathy remains a robust predictor of delinquency and criminal
behavior across different operationalizations of the construct (Geerlings et al., 2020),
and trajectory research demonstrates an early onset of antisocial behavior that can
persist into adult years (McCuish et al., 2015).
Research demonstrates that the pattern of antisociality of juvenile psychopathy can
extend to sexual offending, although studies have differed in profiles of juvenile psy-
chopathy among sexual offending and nonsexual offending youth. In a Portuguese

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT