Judge Properly. Questioned Witness at Trial to Clarify Insurance Fraud Allegations: Plus A Second Case Review Regarding Water Damage.

AuthorZalma, Barry
PositionON MY RADAR

* Melbourne Reid appealed from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ira H. Margulis, J.), rendered April 20, 2018, convicting him of falsifying business records in the first degree, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, making a punishable false written statement (two counts), criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and falsely reporting an incident in the third degree, all relating to an insurance fraud attempt, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. In The People of the State of New York v. Melbourne Reid, No. 2021-05593, Ind. No. 1076/17, Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (October 13, 2021) the appellate court disposed of the appeal quickly.

Was Defendant Deprived of His Right to a Fair Trial by the Courts Questioning of a trial Witness?

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not deprived of his right to a fair trial by the Supreme Court's participation in questioning the trial witnesses. The trial court has a vital role in clarifying confusing testimony and facilitating the orderly and expeditious progress of the trial (People v Yut Wai Tom, 53 N.Y.2d 44, 57; see People v Jamison, 47 N.Y.2d 882, 883-884; People v Moulton, 43 N.Y.2d 944; People v De Jesus, 42 N.Y.2d 519).

When it clearly appears to the judge that for one reason or another the case is not being presented intelligibly to the jury, the judge may, by questions to a witness, elicit relevant and important facts, and may interrogate a witness after a cross-examination that appears to be misleading to the jury. The overarching principle restraining the court's discretion is that it is the function of the judge to protect the record at trial, not to make it.

The conduct of the court must be measured both qualitatively and quantitatively. Rather, the record as a whole demonstrates that the court was impartial and not biased against the defendant.

ZALMA OPINION

People who work to defraud an insurance company, like Mr. Reid, who falsified multiple documents in an attempt to defraud his insurer, simply refuse to accept the fact that they were caught and continue to use, and misuse the courts, to defeat the fact that a jury of his peers found him guilty. Judges do not wear gags. They can, and must, ask questions if a witness responses or lack of responses confuse the jury. Reid tried to use legitimate questions by the trial judge to a witness to avoid his sentence. He will spend time in the grey bar hotel.

Building Vacant for...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT