Joint Pretrial Order, Consent Judgment, and Permanent Injunction as to Defendant

AuthorKenneth L. Dorsney
Pages887-889
21. Plan food arrangements for attorneys, experts, client, fact witnesses, and
support staff.
22. Secure trial graphics vendor.
23. Secure trial-site copy vendor.
24. Prepare attorney documents for shipment to trial site.
25. Ship trial related documents and things.
Joint Pretrial Order, Consent Judgment, and Permanent
Injunction as to Defendant
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
[Name of District]
[DISTRICT COURT CAPTION]
This matter is before the Court on the unopposed motion of Plaintiff
Brand, Inc. (“Brand”) and Defendant Generic, Inc. (“Generic”).
WHEREAS, this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction as to
Generic, Inc. concerns only Brand’s claims against Generic and Generic’s counterclaims
against Brand in this Civil Action No. 12-3456 (JDG) (referred to herein as the
“Litigation”).
WHEREAS, Brand requests that this Consent Judgment and Permanent
Injunction as to Generic, Inc. be entered in the above-captioned case, and Generic does
not oppose Brand’s request.
WHEREAS, Brand owns United States Patent No. 1 (“the ’001 patent”).
WHEREAS, Generic submitted Abbreviated New Drug Application No.
12-345 (“Generic’s ANDA”) to the FDA under 21 U.S.C. § 355(j) seeking to obtain
approval to commercially manufacture and sell GenX tablets for the treatment of a
condition.
WHEREAS, in the Litigation, Brand alleged that Generic infringed one or
more of claims 3, 4, 12, and 13 of the ’001 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2) by virtue
of Generic’s submission of Generic’s ANDA to the FDA.
WHEREAS, in this Litigation, Brand alleged that it would be irreparably
harmed if Generic is not enjoined from infringing or actively inducing or contributing to
infringement of one or more of claims 3, 4, 12, and 13 of the ’001 patent.
WHEREAS, in this Litigation, Brand requested that this Court enter a
permanent injunction enjoining Generic from infringing the ’001 patent.
WHEREAS, Brand and Generic have reached an agreement to finally
settle the Litigation as set forth in this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction as to
Generic, Inc. and a separate Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) which is
contemporaneously and separately being executed.
WHEREAS, final settlement of the Litigation will help Brand and Generic
avoid the substantial uncertainty and risks involved with prolonged litigation.
887
A-45
dor54588_24_app_663–914.indd 887 5/5/16 5:06 PM

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT