Is victory in the eye of the beholder?

Author:Codrea, David

"GOA Racks up Huge Victories from Coast-to-Coast the email proclaimed. "Candidates backed by Gun Owners of America scored tremendous wins. ..."

The "no-compromise gun lobby" was referring to the results of the Nov. 2010 midterm elections, where Republicans recaptured the House and took an unstoppable majority away from Senate Democrats.

"In many cases, GOA was the only national pro-gun organization to actively oppose Nancy Pelosi's 'Blue Dog' Democrats," the announcement continued.

"Our aggressive opposition to These Representatives--who are mistakenly considered to be somewhat conservative--was well worth the effort as Pelosi has now been reduced to minority status?"

This was a thinly-disguised reference to the National Rifle Association's "single issue" endorsement policy that included support for many presented as "pro-gun Democrats."

"We are a non-partisan organization, and we don't base any grade or any endorsement on a party affiliation," Institute for Legislative Action executive director Chris Cox explained in a National Review Online interview. "We have a pro-incumbent policy," he added.

This did not go over well with the GOP establishment, which apparently feels a sense of entitlement, despite fielding a few outright miserable choices like "assault weapon" ban bill author Mark Kirk of Illinois, and Dan Coats of Indiana, who had previously supported both the Brady Bill and the federal semi auto ban.

"National Republicans are furious with the National Rifle Association, their natural ally," Z. Byron Wolf of ABC News reported, "for endorsing 58 incumbent Democrats who support gun rights. And with Republicans aiming to win control of the House, some are promising retribution for the NRA next year."

As expected, claims of victory came not only from the actual winners, but also from those desperate...

To continue reading