Introduction

Pages1-14
Date18 November 2019
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-821-620191001
Published date18 November 2019
AuthorHoda Mahmoudi
Introduction
Hoda Mahmoudi
Human Dignity: A Notion Dened, A Dening Notion
Human dignity denes us. It shapes a narrative of who we are, who we were,
and who we may become. It grapples with ideas of autonomy, spirituality, rights,
responsibilities, and the individual versus the collective. Dening human dignity
provides a means of dening the basic nature of our humanity – a way of answer-
ing the “big” questions. The search for these answers has captivated every tribe,
culture, and nation, and continues to do so today.
But though it is one of the most important topics of our age – and of ages
past – it is also one of the most difcult subjects to discern, describe, or dene. It
can be elusive and squishy. But though it’s meaning and messages are challenging
to enumerate, its importance is beyond question. This is because the concept of
human dignity lies at the fault line of our greatest moral and ethical challenges.
The idea that there is something indivisible and irreducible about the human spe-
cies, and the concomitant demands and responsibilities that this idea confers on
individuals, communities, and states surrounds the debate of every critical soci-
etal challenge. Though we may not always view it as such, human dignity – the
sense of what is right, decent, proper, moral, and ethical about how we relate to
one another – frames all the great questions about our human experience.
Human Dignity: A History
In the Western world prior to 1900, human dignity was associated with the works
of Kant, the writings of the French Revolution, and Catholic social thought1
(particularly the papacy of Leo XIII 1878–1903; Beitz, 2013). To Kant, human
dignity and freedom were intrinsic to all human beings – a status that placed
human beings above all others. In this sense human dignity is inviolable – it can-
not be taken away based on one’s actions. In the writings of the French Revolu-
tion dignity was a responsibility enacted, a code lived-out, and an inner garden
1See Rerum Novarum, Encyclical of Pope Leo Xiii on Capital And Labor. http://
w2.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_
rerum-novarum.html.
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human Dignity and Human Rights, 1–14
Copyright © 2020 by Emerald Publishing Limited
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved
doi:10.1108/978-1-78973-821-620191001

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT