Introduction

AuthorRonald D. Slusky
Pages267-267
267
Introduction to Part IV: Preparing and Prosecuting
the Patent Application
PART IV—Preparing and Prosecuting the Patent Application—addresses
three topics: preparing the specification, responding to claim rejections
during prosecution, and working with the inventor. These activities may
seem unrelated, but each should be informed by the same notions that
inform the analysis and claiming of the invention—the inventive concept,
the problem, the solution, and the fallback features.
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN begins the overall topic of preparing the specifica-
tion by considering who its audience is and what their needs are. It then
focuses on the first two sections of the specification—the Background of
the Invention and the Summary of the Invention—and explains how the
problem-solution statement can serve as the basis for an effective, story-
telling Background and Summary that can engage that audience and, in
the process, advance the interests of the patent owner.
CHAPTER NINETEEN shows how the Background and Summary pro-
vide a framework on which the Detailed Description can be built to
advance the problem-solution story. The chapter also offers suggestions
for streamlining the process of writing the Detailed Description more
efficiently. The prescription Be Detailed Where the Invention Lives is intro-
duced as a guide for determining which details of the embodiment(s) the
Detailed Description should actually include.
CHAPTERS TWENTY and TWENTY-ONE then turn to claim rejections
and amendments. The heart of Chapter Twenty is a flow diagram laying out
the six options one can take when a claim is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 or
103, based on the answers to four questions about the cited prior art. Chap-
ter Twenty-One then homes in on the use of the invention analysis prin-
ciples described in earlier chapters as the basis for amending claims in the
most appropriate way, should amendment prove to be the desirable option.
CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO describes a methodology for the inventor
interview. Over time, each practitioner develops an approach that seems
to work best for him. This chapter was written mostly with the novice
in mind. It introduces the notion of “self-directed learning” as an effi-
cient way of using the inventor as an information resource to get at the
problem, the solution, and the fallback features. The chapter then goes on
to describe a collaborative process through which the patent lawyer and
inventor can write the patent application together.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT