International Market Integration: A Survey

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12297
Published date01 April 2020
AuthorLilian Ng,Amir Akbari
Date01 April 2020
International Market Integration: A Survey
Amir Akbari*
Faculty of Business and IT, Ontario Tech. University, Canada
Lilian Ng
Schulich School of Business, York University, Canada
Received 19 February 2020; Accepted 4 March 2020
Abstract
Market integration is a canonical topic in international finance. The question of whether and
to what extent markets are integrated with the global economy has motivated one of the lar-
gest literatures in this field. Given this vast body of research, this survey shall only focus on
the theoretical and empirical studies on one aspect of market integration equity market
integration. It reviews the evolution of various approaches employed in studying market inte-
gration. This survey discusses the recent empirical findings on cross-sectional and time-series
dynamics of integration across developed and emerging markets. It also describes the empiri-
cal estimation of three current measures of market integration and discusses their usefulness
as well as limitations. Finally, the survey provides a few future directions for this line of
research.
Keywords Financial market integration; Segmentation; Economic integration
JEL Classification: E44, F15, F30, G15
1. Introduction
Financial deregulation and liberalization in developed (DEV) countries gained
momentum with the abolition of capital controls in the early 1980s. However, this
process only occurred in emerging (EMG) economies in the late 1980s and the
1990s. A voluminous literature has since accumulated on the financial and eco-
nomic ramifications of financial deregulation and globalization. With this vast liter-
ature, it is almost impossible for one to conduct a comprehensive survey. Thus, in
this review, we focus on the theoretical and empirical research on one aspect of
market integration equity market integration. We review the various approaches
employed in studying market integration and discuss the recent empirical findings
on cross-sectional and time-series dynamics of integration across DEV and EMG
markets. Our review also describes the empirical estimation of three current
*Corresponding author: Faculty of Business and IT, Ontario Tech. University, Oshawa, ON,
Canada. Tel: +1-905-721-8668, email: amir.akbari@ontariotechu.ca.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies (2020) 49, 161–195 doi:10.1111/ajfs.12297
©2020 Korean Securities Association 161
measures of market integration and discusses their usefulness as well as their limita-
tions.
This survey starts by providing the theoretical framework in which market inte-
gration is defined and tested. Theoretically, markets are perfectly integrated if finan-
cial assets with the same risk profile have identical expected returns irrespective of
the market they are traded in. In other words, the premise of financial market inte-
gration is the law of one price (Chen and Knez, 1995). Conversely, in the presence
of foreign investment barriers, international risk sharing is inefficient and, therefore,
markets become segmented. These barriers, either explicit, such as capital controls
and taxes on repatriation, or implicit, such as investment environment and quality
of financial institutions, impede cross-border investment and risk sharing. As a
result, in the past four decades DEV and EMG markets actively have taken mea-
sures to lift these barriers and open their markets. Consistent with these steps, we
observe that the world market has become economically and financially more inte-
grated.
Despite the pervasive evidence that markets are becoming more integrated, ther e
is no uniformly accepted measure of integration. Measuring integration is a formid-
able task. Early studies have identified market integration as the convergence of
asset prices and strong co-movement of returns across countries. However, the
interpretation of this simplistic measure is fraught with a fundamental flaw. As
(Pukthuanthong and Roll 2009) argue, countries can be perfectly integrated even
when their market portfolio return correlations are low. When there are multiple
global sources of return variations, assets of countries do not necessarily have simi-
lar exposures to all of them. That is, the returns of countries’ market portfolios,
while only weakly correlated, can be fully explained by these global factors and
hence, countries can be perfectly integrated. Subsequent studies attempt to measure
market integration in the context of an asset pricing model, but such an approach
involves a joint test of multiple hypotheses, thereby making it difficult to draw any
definite inferences.
To overcome this challenge, recent empirical studies have focused mainly on
either ad hoc arbitrage pricing theory (APT) models or non-direct asset pricing
models. Following the first approach, Pukthuanthong and Roll (2009) propose a
simple and intuitive measure of integration based on the R-square of a multi-factor
regression model, where the factors are estimated using a principal component anal-
ysis. They argue that markets could be globally integrated as long as their assets are
similarly exposed to the same global shocks. Bekaert et al. (2011), on the other
hand, take a different approach to measuring market integration. They focus on an
approximation of Gordon’s growth model and develop a segmentation measure, the
SEG Index, based on industry-valuation differentials. If countries are completely
integrated, growth opportunities and discount rates of similar assets (e.g., indus -
tries) are equalized across different markets. Therefore, the current earnings to stock
price ratio should be identical within each industry across countries, therefore, SEG
should be zero for fully integrated markets.
A. Akbari and L. Ng
162 ©2020 Korean Securities Association
Both Pukhuanthong and Roll’s (2009) R-square and Bekaert et al.’s (2011)
SEG are developed on the premise that the marked increase in market integration
is due to the rise in risk sharing among financial markets, and they ignore the
existence of real economic activity. To address this issue, Akbari et al. (2019) pro-
pose the economic and financial integration metrics that are derived using a
return decomposition approach: economic integration is measured by a common
cash-flow dynamic and financial integration is a common risk-pricing dynamic.
To facilitate comparison, we provide a detailed description of how the three dif-
ferent integration measures are constructed and estimated. We then replicate each
measure using the same sample of 41 DEV and EMG markets over the same per-
iod between 1989 and 2015. Such an analysis will offer readers significant insights
on each approach, as well as their usefulness and limitations in characterizing
market integration.
We next review both the cross-sectional and time-series empirical evidence on
equity market integration, focusing mainly on the recent literature. We also survey
the numerous studies that attempt to examine the drivers of equity market integra-
tion. Our review not only summarizes prior empirical research that investigates the
dynamics of integration through time but also during the global financial crisis.
The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 surveys the theoretical literature
on international integration. It primarily discusses the framework that various
researchers employ to define market integration. Section 3 describes the construc-
tion and estimation of two widely referenced integration measures in the literature
and the recently developed metrics for assessing economic and financial integra-
tions. In this section, we also provide a comparison of these three measures across
time and across DEV and EMG markets. Section 4 surveys the cross-country evi-
dence on market integration and its determinants. Section 5 investigates the
dynamics of integration through time, and Section 6 offers some avenues for
future research.
2. Theoretical Framework and Definition
Market integration is characterized by the existence of a unique global pricing ker-
nel (or stochastic discount factor, SDF) that governs asset prices across the world
(see, e.g., Adler and Dumas, 1983; Solnik, 1974; Stulz, 1981a). If markets are fully
integrated, then assets with the same risk must have identical expected returns, irre-
spective of the market, where risk refers to exposure to common world factors.
Thus, in a globally integrated market, the price of asset jis derived based on its
expected cash flows and their covariance with SDF, as follows:
1
1
For simplicity, we adopt the notation of Cochrane (2005) when reviewing various interna-
tional asset pricing models.
International Market Integration: A Survey
©2020 Korean Securities Association 163

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT